bridge (659) - Sydney, AUSTRALIA - FEB 21, 2007
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Typical pale lager appearance - yellow gold with a loose white head and lots of bubbles. Light tasting with some mealy grains coming through. No sign of the NZ hops except for a little bitterness. Rather boring and plain.
detroitsteel (235) - Greater London, ENGLAND - JAN 5, 2007
2.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
Iím ashamed to admit Iím predisposed to antipathy towards anything antipodean, living as I do in west London. It pains me therefore to report that Macís Gold is a ok beer. Not that much to look at - standard golden hue, but very light in the mouth, soft, creamy flavour thatís low on sharpe notes. I didnít detect many hops in there. Itís a bit watery, but at least its distictive. Nice bottle design.
Stew41 (1796) - Woodend, AUSTRALIA - NOV 29, 2006
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Not sure if this meant to be marketed as a mid-strength (perhaps not at 4%) but goes quite ok for a mainstream beer in this style. Pale lager yellow in colour and thin head, low density head. No discernable character on the nose. Soft malt driven palate that clearly (or at least to my palate) has a low ABV feel about it. Malts taste just a fraction stale and daggy (the intensity of the malt reminds me of the fading fruit power of a mature red wine. Medium weight finish. Better than most macro mid-strengths getting around.
ALLOVATE (2595) - Perth, AUSTRALIA - NOV 18, 2006
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Oh, bugger it. Geez, the bottles impressive. Good ítalk-you-in-to-ití promo on the back. I thought I found a dead-set winner. Then I peeled the top and it did a Malt Shovel on me.
Pours a clear, thinly looking yellow gold. Head was flaccid to start off with but barely broke the 2 minute height barrier before fizzying away to nothing. Err, maybe a few legs in there as it went. Aroma of watered down cordial - as a tot I couldnít have this before bedtime otherwise I may wet the bed. Problem is, I dare a few too many of these and I may burst a valve in the bar. Thin, watery again and overly subtle in the mouth thought it was íThorpeís-brandí exercise water with just a little citrus. Not too much!!!
Zingy and bubbly, taste of íPassionaí perceptible, dull malt, umm, perhaps and a little sourness in back. Finish is hospital clean, very crisp and like you werenít drinking beer at all. Faultless if I was judging soda - but I ainít, arenít, is not?
Points added for just being braindeadedly clean, free of thought and emotion.Cheers (33cL, 14/03/07, Intíl Beer Shop, W. Leederville)
Jimthechap (2041) - Christchurch, NEW ZEALAND - AUG 22, 2006
1.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 1/20
Why oh why oh why did this ever get put on tap by Lion breweries? This beer used to be absolute summery perfection in bottles enjoyed on the beach. Now this product is served in slightly upmarket NZ bars but should never have been allowed to be kegged. It used to be a complex and aromatic golden lager but now has been misled by the big brewing mentality that also ruined Montieths. Shame on Lion breweries and damn them to hell.
farmboy (218) - Barwon Heads, AUSTRALIA - JUN 4, 2006
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
One of the more complex beers Iíve had. Entry to the mouth is pleasant, but the after taste is alightly grungy and almost dirty. Tried two bottles. Second one was slightly better. Yep, Iíd drink it if it were offered, but wouldnít go out of my way.
strings (377) - Sydney, AUSTRALIA - MAY 4, 2006
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Pretty boring, but fairly drinkable as long as itís not the focus of your attention.
sinkhole (263) - Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA - APR 21, 2006
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Light golden appearance with a slightly fruity overtone, this beer was an uninspiring selection and I quickly moved on to others.
Choos (662) - Taylors Hill, AUSTRALIA - APR 3, 2006
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Aroma: lagery and citrus notes. Appearance: pale gold with a large soap bubbly head and large bubbles rising to the surface. Flavour: some maltiness with quite a few hoppy notes. Palate: thin and hoppy aftertaste with quite a bit of carbonation. Actually could be refreshing.
johninmelb (1127) - Bristol, Gloucestershire, ENGLAND - MAR 19, 2006
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Looks, smells, tastes, and finishes like nothing - itís as if you havenít drunk anything at all. Although there is nothing particularly unpleasant to take away from this beer, it is one of the most boring beers Iíve tried in a very long time.