leaparsons (9505) - Leicester, Leicestershire, ENGLAND - JUL 21, 2005
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle. Light gold with a white bubbly head. Aromas are grain, corn and metal with soap and some sour fruitiness. Flavours are sweet grain with caramel, biscuit and some fruity sourness. Not too bad in the end. Nice bottle, too. Warning - it has just warmed up, and its not so good. Drink it quick and its OK.
duff (5484) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - JUN 2, 2005
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Bottle. Pretty sweet and thin. Reminded me of Cascade Summer Blonde, another of these golden summery, bland lagers which seem to be popular down under. Sweet pale malt, and not much else. In many ways this is a typical Antipodean lager, but perhaps this is a bit cleaner.
Aarleks (409) - Sydney, AUSTRALIA - MAY 12, 2005
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle: Clear yellw without much head. Smells like a pilsne; golden malts and some grassy hops... not much though. The flavour is dissapointing and watery. Not much of anything there really. Not too good really.
Papsoe (25063) - Frederiksberg, DENMARK - MAR 19, 2005
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: FEB 11, 2008 (Bottle 33,5 cl) McCashinís, a small and proundly independent brewery situated in the middle of the hop growing area in NZ around Nelson. Pale golden, with quite a decent head. Fairly classical lager type with a nice hop-bite. Surprisingly full body considering the low alcohol. 270603
(On tap) Courtesy of yalnikim. Clear, pale golden with a small, white head. Lightly sweet, malty nose. Medium body with notes of malt, brewing cereal and fruit. Dry finish. In the better end of NZ Pale Lagers, yet still just a Pale Lager though. 4/2/4/2/8=2.0 310108
LittleChicken (6) - ENGLAND - DEC 16, 2004 does not count
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Pours well, decent head which died away quite quickly. Golden to light amber colour with medium size bubbles. Taste was bland with a slight hoppy aftertaste which disappeared very quickly. Not as watery as Fosters, but then this isnít too bad for a mass produced beer. Best drunk freezing cold on a hot antipodean day.
bluevegie (3070) - Perth, AUSTRALIA - OCT 10, 2004
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Pale golden body with a good size white head that left some lacing and hung around for a while. From there it went downhill, taste was a bit bland and watery, some grapefruit, a bit metallic and not that much else.
Ingevara (886) - SWEDEN - JUN 18, 2004
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Tall, stiff head. rather malty and dry, better than standard lagers, but it’s difficult to notice any hops. A decent meal drink or to fresh'n up a hot sunny day.
Jeppe (2631) - Brooklyn, Alabama, USA - FEB 23, 2004
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Dark yellow beer with an OK head. Malty and mild citrus aroma. Flavor is a little strange and undefineable. Watery with some malt, citrus and nut. A different lager and not very interesting.
motelpogo (7705) - Plzen, CZECH REPUBLIC - JAN 27, 2004
0.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
sorry clondest but i drank this in the pub and i thought it sucked pretty seriously. zero hops, pretty bland, even for premium lager
eczematic (1325) - Adelaide, AUSTRALIA - JAN 6, 2004
0.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 1/20
ZERO FLAVOUR. ok maybe an extremely faint nut taste. brewed for the connoisseur of cardboard. i hate this brewery.