beaconstreet (811) - Washington DC, USA - MAY 27, 2004
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 6/20
Mm, blah, mm. But not too blah. Has a spicy rich sweetness over the matted grass. But the richness is weird, like a say a few thousand pennies scattered on the ground rich. Has a very Yankee Stadium skank to it otherwise. Hard to define, but not as terrible as typical light beer.
raymow (767) - Bensalem, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 22, 2004
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Not horrible. How's that for a ringing endorsement? Honestly though, I could drink it if need be. If I was going for that whole low carb bullshit - this might be the beer. I like this over Michelob Ultra.
harlequinn (2744) - Tacoma, Washington, USA - DEC 25, 2003
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
This truly was not bad for a low carb style beer. This actually had some flavor to it. Light but not too light, and very easy to drink, but there is just nothing to it really, you cannot even tell you are drinking a beer.
mribm (445) - Hurley, New York, USA - NOV 1, 2003
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
12 oz. bottle. This was my first low carb beer and it was just ok. Not any malt or hop flavor, however it does quench your thirst and it only has 89 calories per bottle. Bright yellow in color, with a small white head which faded fast. No lacing. No aroma. A lot like drinking carbonated water, only there is some alcohol in this. This would be a great thirst quencher on a hot summer day.
beastdog75 (362) - Brick, New Jersey, USA - FEB 6, 2004
1.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Another watery low-carb beer. Has a little more flavor than Michelob Ultra and Rolling Rock Green Light. Has some fruity taste and aroma, but mostly has a wet paper flavor to it along with some flat selzter water flavor.
happy4hops (376) - Bel Air, Maryland, USA - MAR 9, 2004
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
The best low-carber brew.Not very good but could beer-bong a few(ouch)Maybe?
PorterPounder (4942) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - APR 6, 2004
1.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Just a tad better than the Aspen Edge I just finished. Aroma is not as offensive - has a bit of a malt kick to it. The appearance is lifeless and dull thoiugh - little to no head and almost colorless - no head. Flavor has an apple juice taste and moutfeel to it - not as fizzy as most low carbs. Has a bit of a malt character to it. Could drink this if medically ordered.
MrBeerUSA (40) - HorseShoe, North Carolina, USA - JUN 4, 2004
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Just a little to fruity for my liking. But all in all not terrible. Just a fruity tasting weak beer.
nick76 (4126) - Tampa, Florida, USA - NOV 26, 2005
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
UPDATED: FEB 7, 2007 The aroma keeps this from being a better than average diet beer. There seems to be gasoline in it. I don’t taste it but that along with corn and alcohol seem to be in the aroma. The appearance is super typical and not worth mentioning. The flavor on the other hand is another story. If you can hold your nose its better than some low cal/low carb beers out there. Mostly it tastes like malt but it’s not offensive. The palate is super thin. The brewer needs to work on the aroma of this one.
Shagnasty (130) - Rochester, New York, USA - APR 7, 2004
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
It truly tastes like sugar water with a dash of Coors light in it. A sorry excuse for a beer, but it is drinkable and totally unoffensive. Good for nothing but an altered state of consciousness.