joehribar@hhsgov (2) - Alexandria, Virginia, USA - JUN 14, 2005 does not count
5 AROMA 10/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 20/20
Great beer., great taste not bloating I wish I could find it in northern VA.
DYCSoccer17 (3305) - Woodland, California, USA - MAY 28, 2005
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Can. Grassy, sour skunked yeast in the nose. Pretty darn sour nose. Transparent apple juice color with a small quickly dissipating false white head. Start is kind of sweet turning sour and metallic to finish. A strange bitterness lingers....Pretty rough stuff...
MikeT (76) - Hollis, New Hampshire, USA - APR 28, 2005
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: FEB 16, 2008 A blond pur with typical carbonated head and lace. A slightly sweet aroma that brings back memories of past days in upstate NY and SU. Not bad for a mass produced beer.
The new version of this beer is rather smooth and creamy and the "headache in every beer" is gone!
scooter122983 (17) - West Des Moines, Iowa, USA - MAR 28, 2005
2.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
A pale lager with a little hoppy taste and a quicky diminshing head also a little flat tasting. I hope that other beers from New York arent influenced by this brew.
GirlyBeer (190) - Old Orchard Beach, Maine, USA - FEB 10, 2005
2.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
UPDATED: JUN 3, 2005 I like Utica Club. Could be genetic because my father and grandmother grew up drinking it. Most people I know seem to think it’s pretty bad. I find it quite tasty.
BrewEd (182) - Wilmington, North Carolina, USA - JAN 25, 2005
1.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
The aromawas really the high point with hints of malt and a hoppy presence. Taste was definitely downhill from the aroma - a bland, sweet, watered-down, malt liquor flavor. I can’t say this was a really bad beer - it just lacked any real distinction or quality.
Osgood (6) - Utica, New York, USA - NOV 24, 2004 does not count
4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 18/20
I enjoy this beer quite a bit. My partiality to this beer could be because that i’m a Utican myself or it could be the delectable taste for such a low price.
mongkut4 (132) - Florida, USA - AUG 8, 2004
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
One of the worst beers I’ve had the misfortune to pour down my throat. I’m not sure what they were trying to create but if it was swill, they succeeded.
Maximus55 (40) - California, USA - AUG 3, 2004
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Oh come on people this stuff aint that bad now hehehehe, You shold at least give it a try and if you don’t like it then you at least tried it. It’s cheap itll get you drunk, have fun.
shadey (1881) - Nashville, Tennessee, USA - JUN 24, 2004
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
pee pee in a can. If you had ever been to Utica, you would understand. It needs to be cheap and it needs to keep you drunk. The taste takes a very distant third.