TheBeerOrg (1570), Kentucky, USA
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 4/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 7/20 | Oct 26, 2006 Pours brownish amber with al ight tan head. Aroma is corny, with caramel malt and adjuncts. Taste is light caramel, bready with some lightly metallic falvors. Mouthfeel is thin bodied, watery with spritzy overcarbonation. moejuck (1165), Ohio, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | Oct 25, 2006 This was better than I expected, but it definitely is not a bock. It pour dark brown with a definite red tint. There is basically no aroma to speak of, and the very thin head dissipates very quickly. The taste is nutty with a slight maltiness to it. Very little aftertase. It is drinkable and smooth, especially for a macro. alafito (334), tijuana, Mexico
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 | Oct 21, 2006 On tap at Seaworld... nothing much to say really.. its the same Michelob with some added color and a tad more malts... a bit acidic and metalic, and tiny hints of smoke and roasted malts. Definatly not a Bock beer, but i would order it over the regular macros. CelticBrew (691), The Crystal Coast, North Carolina, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 | Oct 21, 2006 Well, its a decent product from a overly commercialized brewery. Dark, fair aroma. Somewhat smooth, however the taste was overall un inspiring. Sorta an ill attempt by AB/Michelob to capture the micro/macro/euro and US beer/ales that are truely remarkable. Sorry AB, once again you miss the mark, though this may one of YOUR best attempts, keep trying guys. jblendy (518), Midland Park, New Jersey, USA
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 | Oct 20, 2006 Tastes and smells like a slightly maltier michelob lager to me. Not bad, but nothing special. Better than most typical crap lagers though. roccotool (25), USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 4/10 | 4/5 | 9/20 | Oct 17, 2006 Aroma was good, appearance was average. Flavor was ok for a commercial brew, so they gained some points there. Palate was the typical, cheap watery sort from corporate beer. Gotta give a little more credit because they’re at least trying. limalimamoli (52), Oceanside, California, USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 4/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 | Oct 13, 2006 No real apperant hop aroma, slight roast malt aroma. Flavor is lacking the roast and is alomst wine like or sherry like. No head but highly carbonated. Very watery and lean. TheStPauliGirl (9), USA does not count | 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 4/5 | 13/20 | Oct 13, 2006 This is a perfect beer for those who are poor, drink a lot, but can’t stomach the typical piss-tasting keg beers.
|