bourne (161), Suwon, South Korea Jun 1, 2006 Dark amber with a tan head. Not as carbonated or "crisp" as most comercial beers. some decent malt character(caramel). Id go so far as to say its the best macro in the states, but its no prize winner. Beerdedone (1873), Croydon, Pennsylvania, USA May 31, 2006 Bottle. Pours dark amber with a decent off-white head. Aroma of roast, caramel malts, and grain. Flavor is sweet, caramel malts, weak, but drinkable. Nothing great, but not a bad brew. LAboozehound (47), Lafayette, Louisiana, USA May 28, 2006 Good dark beer, tastes too sluggish after a few. Unfair bias due to the corporate title, but one of the better macro brewed American beers. BeerPig (3), Springdale, Arkansas, USA does not count May 25, 2006 I tend to drink more dark beer in the winter and this beer always satisfies. It’s not the best beer in this category but you can do much worse. sausage86 (27), USA May 18, 2006 one of better michelob brews. pours dark. noticed roasted malt and some brown sugar. no smell, no bitter finish. tasted good for first 3/4 of the bottle. i like it. aenimopiate (142), The United States of Texas, Texas, USA May 18, 2006 I’d say this one is in line with the same general flavor offered by every other michelob beer, which goes along the lines of non-offensive mass-produced macrobrew beer that is affordable and tolerable. Of course this one is thicker than the lighter alternatives. One of my picks for a cheapo daily drinker. MonsterMash (58), North Tonowanda, New York, USA May 11, 2006 No smell, thin body but fine coloring. Thin to drink as well, but some malt and brown suger flavors are good. By the end of the glass though it drags. stoutlvr (52), Lansing, Michigan, USA May 10, 2006 This beer would be good if not for the filtration process that ruins any beer.
|