 jbuzz (464), South Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
Sep 6, 2007
I haven’t had this recently. I did enjoy the dry beers when it was popular years ago and I do recall this one being one of my favorites.
BlackDonald (1040), North Carolina, USA
Aug 8, 2008 I don’t know why they bother making so many skus of similar products. I really hope that InBev steps in and skims back all the over produced crap. Not quite as sweet int he malt profile, with a grassy hop note, but still watery and overproduced crap.
ROGUE (126), Newark, Delaware, USA
Feb 13, 2008 This stuff sucks. Whats dry about it, it tasted wet to me? Same crap different packaging.
StFun (298), Indiana, USA
Jan 28, 2008 Terrible, terrible beer. I like some macro stuff and I still think this is bad. Headache city. "Bold" taste like Bud is "bold", meaning "strong and not good". Pass this one up. How does this get a 2%? I’d rather have the Olde English. Bleh!!
SavageElvis (131), Savage, Minnesota, USA
Nov 9, 2007 Yes it is a little less sweet but it is still another bad pale lager. Looked like it may be tasty. I was wrong.
DowntownGator (22), Florida, USA
Nov 3, 2007 No difference from the other dry beers that entered the marketplace en masse not too long ago. As if the dry element to a beer was just discovered.
Nice marketing trick, terrible beer. Wouldn’t recommend it to anyone, even for getting a rating point.
|
