naivepegasus (183), USA
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 | Feb 8, 2008 Pours that glorious macro yellow, with a fair amount of white, foamy head. Some slight corn to the odor, but not as badly as your millers or buds. Did I just take a sip? Oh I guess I did. While the normal "ummm is this a skunked beer?" taste that I’ve grown accustomed to from macros is gone, there isn’t any REAL flavor. Just sorta...well, light. It’s water that’ll get you drunk...eventually. At least I paid very little for very many cans of it, right? bluemooner (230), Blaine, Minnesota, USA
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Jan 28, 2008 Updated: Apr 1, 2009No taste and very light, even for a light beer. Just way too watery and is just one step above bud light which really doesn’t mean a whole lot. shendrix (478), Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Jan 16, 2008 This "beer" doesn’t taste enough like anything to be offensive. It tastes like mildly carbonated water with just a hint of corn. IlanMan (817), Appleton, Wisconsin, USA
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Dec 29, 2007 I used to like this beer before I learned what beer really is. This is a good way to get a hangover. Another typical bland beer. badbeer (433), Iowa, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 | Dec 23, 2007 Free can obtained from friend.
Poured a pale yellow color with a foamy head, leaves no lace around glass. Smell was pretty water but with hints of grain and a bit of corn. Taste emulates the smell for the most part. Light bodied, with a moderate carbonation, wasn’t overcarbonated like most macros. Given a choice, I probably wouldn’t have another. fro2218 (466), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 4/5 | 1/10 | 3/5 | 3/20 | Sep 28, 2007 Golden again. With even less flavor than the regular golden. What??????????? BeerCop (4), USA does not count | 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Sep 11, 2007 If I could rate zero for appearance I would. This stuff should have been put through a strainer first. It’s not Cave Creek, which sucks, but it’s even worse. Sour, vinegar aftertaste. Someone should arrest these brewers for crimes against beer. coopermrkn (26), Minnesota, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | Aug 28, 2007 Updated: Aug 30, 2007Nahh okay. It’s okay but really it’s not that good. I think that anyone could find a better beer.
|