naivepegasus (183), USA Feb 8, 2008 Pours that glorious macro yellow, with a fair amount of white, foamy head. Some slight corn to the odor, but not as badly as your millers or buds. Did I just take a sip? Oh I guess I did. While the normal "ummm is this a skunked beer?" taste that I’ve grown accustomed to from macros is gone, there isn’t any REAL flavor. Just sorta...well, light. It’s water that’ll get you drunk...eventually. At least I paid very little for very many cans of it, right? bluemooner (229), Blaine, Minnesota, USA Jan 28, 2008 Updated: Apr 1, 2009No taste and very light, even for a light beer. Just way too watery and is just one step above bud light which really doesn’t mean a whole lot. shendrix (478), Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA Jan 16, 2008 This "beer" doesn’t taste enough like anything to be offensive. It tastes like mildly carbonated water with just a hint of corn. IlanMan (816), Appleton, Wisconsin, USA Dec 29, 2007 I used to like this beer before I learned what beer really is. This is a good way to get a hangover. Another typical bland beer. badbeer (432), Iowa, USA Dec 23, 2007 Free can obtained from friend.
Poured a pale yellow color with a foamy head, leaves no lace around glass. Smell was pretty water but with hints of grain and a bit of corn. Taste emulates the smell for the most part. Light bodied, with a moderate carbonation, wasn’t overcarbonated like most macros. Given a choice, I probably wouldn’t have another. fro2218 (466), Atlanta, Georgia, USA Sep 28, 2007 Golden again. With even less flavor than the regular golden. What??????????? BeerCop (4), USA does not count Sep 11, 2007 If I could rate zero for appearance I would. This stuff should have been put through a strainer first. It’s not Cave Creek, which sucks, but it’s even worse. Sour, vinegar aftertaste. Someone should arrest these brewers for crimes against beer. coopermrkn (26), Minnesota, USA Aug 28, 2007 Updated: Aug 30, 2007Nahh okay. It’s okay but really it’s not that good. I think that anyone could find a better beer.
|