RateBeer
overall
5
46
style

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 117   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.08   EST. CALORIES: 141   ABV: 4.7%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Introduced in 1991 and distributed in select U.S. markets. Unique bottle and can packaging features exclusive faceted edges.


2.2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
kmeves (1098) - Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, USA - SEP 17, 2002
A nice copy of Miller GD. However, MGD isnít all that good.

2.2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
Ringo (963) - Loveland, Colorado, USA - SEP 11, 2002
What is the market for this? What the hell is it anyway? Is it supposed to be better than regular Michelob, worse, better or worse than Bud, better or worse than urine, they all taste the same to me anyway (well, I havenít actually TASTED urine). And the bottle is stupid. It makes me feel like I am drinking from a bulb holder that fell off of a chandelier or something, which consequently makes the beer seem to have a taste of the dust that would undoubtedly be in said bulb holder. Iím only rating this to get back into the Top 50 anyway.

2.5
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
JPDIPSO (5107) - Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, USA - SEP 6, 2002
Fizzy light golden color with a weak wispy white head. Minimal aroma and flavor. A standard, american standard.

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
MaxPower (961) - St. Louis, Missouri, USA - AUG 2, 2002
Huh?

2.7
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 8/20
rkn65 (106) - st. clair shores, Michigan, USA - AUG 1, 2002
This should be Buds everyday beer.

3.4
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 14/20
Bolt (117) - Boulder Creek, California, USA - JUN 24, 2002
A nice tasting smooth and refreshing and not to filling beer. I enjoyed it very much. I think it tastes a little better then the regular. I don’t know why people are bringing up miller, but this is far more superior than any miller product.

3
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
Ron (3005) - Rochester, New York, USA - JUN 4, 2002
Goes down easy and fast. Maybe too easy. Not as good as regular Mic.

4.3
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 9/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 17/20
markymark (82) - Duluth, Minnesota, USA - APR 10, 2002
Very, very pleased by this quality beverage......

1.6
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 5/20
greystreet80 (191) - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA - APR 9, 2002
I am suprised at the high average rating for this nasty brew. Doesnít beat anything by Miller, except maybe Red Dog.

1.8
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 6/20
Odin (123) - Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA - MAR 23, 2002
This is my least favorite product that carries the Michelob label. Still better than Bud or Miller, but this one needs some work.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  10  11 12


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2015,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50