beerandIT (298) - Richmond, Virginia, USA - JUN 13, 2009
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Pours golden color with absolutely no head. Skunk on the nose and I guess the standard other ingredients in the beer. Light bodied. Not much going on here.
PhatB420 (468) - Pittsfield, Massachusetts, USA - MAY 15, 2013
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
12 bottle into a pint. Clear, thin golden hue, crisp white divides shine through the appearance. Taste is striaght corn, tangy sweet malt, good carbination though, not that dreadful of a brew. the malt punch packs a good deal of clarity to where this is going, but from there the tread falls short. Bland after taste, no compelling malt bite, substandard overall presence, but so much more intriguing that alot of the macros. Not so bad.....
Travlr (7998) - Washington, Washington DC, USA - MAR 2, 2013
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Another beer of my youth. For some reason we felt that Michelob was a classier beer than most of the other lagers around, I’m not sure why. We must’ve been victims of advertising.
Patrickctenchi (1693) - columbus, Indiana, USA - JAN 15, 2013
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 7/20
Pours clear gold with a whipped white head.
Corn malt aroma.
Sweet malt flavour...
Basic...a better than average light.
Slightly enhanced rate due to the fact that in my teen years...errr, when I was 21....I drank a truckload of these....Hey! This was premium stuff in the early 80’s!
Stormkinghiker (16) - - NOV 24, 2012
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 9/20
Nothing special but a beer that us super easy to drink. If you are looking for the buzz, you'll need quite a few if these.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
BMMillsy (686) - Florida, USA - OCT 27, 2012
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Whats the difference between this and Ultra? Is there really a need for more than one of these awful "beers".
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
chicowv (446) - Canaan Valley, West Virginia, USA - OCT 11, 2012
2.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 10/20
12 oz bottle. No need to pour it. No aroma, nothing exciting but smooth and easy to drink.
RuneStumo (1712) - FØRRESFJORDEN, NORWAY - OCT 5, 2012
2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
06.08.2012. 0,33l Bottle. Memphis TN. Pale yellow colour with white head. Low on both flavours and aroma. Very little of everything. Grassy faint hobs. Refreshing when ice cold like a glas of water!
nike (746) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - OCT 2, 2012
3.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
I don’t know, I still like this beer for some strange reason. I didn’t know that they still made it. Typical macro light beer, nothing more.
BVery (4261) - Burnsville, Minnesota, USA - SEP 4, 2012
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Bottle. Clear pale yellow pour with a white head. Bland, tasteless, odorless (save a touch of skunkiness), and very thin. I expected no more from this.
UDBeernut (872) - Near Buffalo, New York, USA - JUL 14, 2012
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
6 pack from the local walmart for a cheap attempt to drown out a tough day on the railroad. I had only two but both were more enjoyable than the average light beer. Pale yellow, well balanced bitterness. Enough grassy hops to be noticeable. Typical water body. Perhaps the best of the light beers???