fordest (1954), Santee/San Diego, California, USA
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 | Aug 22, 2006 Much better than the original ultra. There is some flavor in this one. Still rather watered down, but what do you expect. If you want ultra and have a choice, reach for the amber. SudsMcDuff (1691), was CapeTown,SA-now Houston, Texas, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 | Aug 19, 2006 has no back off or offensive tastes...is very very smooth...gets the job done on a hot day or counting calories..that being said, it is very weak in the aroma,looks and taste department, not bad just very lacking..and not even that "fizzy" if u know what i mean..alot better than reg mich ultra but its still a mich ultra.. mddawso (89), Normal, Illinois, USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 6/20 | Aug 18, 2006 Bottle - Probabally the best light pale lager I’ve had. That doesn’t say much though. It was thin, fizzy. No flavor. jblendy (518), Midland Park, New Jersey, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 1/5 | 6/20 | Aug 14, 2006 Basically the same as the regular miche’ ultra, with a slightly amber apearance, and slightly more beer flavor. For some reason it seams to be more filling though.Also, leaves an almost filmy feeeling on the palate. dkoonce (884), People’s Republic of Athens, Ohio, USA
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 3/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Aug 13, 2006 Tap at the Budweiser brewery tour. This beer looks like a brown ale or lager. But, the aroma is almost nothing and the body is painfully weak. This beer was so lame, I skipped the other free beers on the tour. 00cobraR (1098), Greensboro, North Carolina, USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 | Aug 13, 2006 don t know what it looks like as i drank it out of the bottle. i assume its an amber color from the label. aroma was slightly sweet and malty. Flavor was a little suprising. Could a macro actually have some flavor. its seems as if this one does. bare in mind it is slight but easily the best offer of the michaelobe line. at least from what i have drank. jayme9874 (756), Hamburg, New York, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 | Aug 6, 2006 Pale amber color. Little head and lace. Nose has a hint of grain with a flash of caramel and lots of corn baby. Thin in body, only mildly offensive in mouth, has a bit of a sour like plastic taste and then settles into a semi-sweet cereal and corn syrup flavor. Bravo AB, another poor excuse for beer but it will make you millions, I guess that makes you pretty damn smart. shrubber85 (2881), Wallhalben, Germany
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 | Aug 5, 2006 Updated: Sep 8, 2006Bottle. A very light sour barley malt aroma. Medium amber color with decent head at first but quickly goes away. Lightly sweet malt flavor with a slight hint of hops. Actually a pleasant surprise - much more flavor that most light beers and actually has more flavor than some of the BMC regular beers - the only light (calorie) beer I’ve ever had that beats it was Gambrinus Dia but good luck finding that outside of Czech. A good effort by A-B in making a drinkable low carb beer.
|