2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20 Goodfella (60) - St. Louis, Missouri, USA - SEP 17, 2004
so what if its low-carb, its a gimmic and a diet fad. the beer is pretty bad, but if your on the low-carb thing, this beer is for you not me
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20 Maria (7805) - Thisted, DENMARK - APR 8, 2010
It’s golden with a wehak head. In fact everything about it is weak, both the slightly malty and flowery aroma and flavour, and the complete lack of bitterness must make it ideal for everyone, that really doesn’t like beer. Flawless as such, just very uninspiring.
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20 Dacrza (302) - Great Meadows, New Jersey, USA - NOV 24, 2007
Another "fun" reviewer... to say I am "sessioning" this is to say one is taste-testing a chicken nugget...sad when a beer’s advertisiements actually DO approximate what to expect from the taste...sparkling translucent effervescent yellow body with a hint of head--champagne from a distance...light hints of bread and dough, classic cereal....a bit of chemical cleanliness? Light watery body that bubbles around the tongue--fleeting in presence...the beechwood aging appellationwould best apply here...refreshing is the commercial (and euphemistic) word for anything this "ultra"...no surprises: a beer that somehow manages a measly amount of carbs and sacrifices a ton of character possibilities for a chance to be consumed in mass quantities by club-hopping hipsters (or so notes the commercials)...and I’m strangely okay with that, from this distance...
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20 kimcgolf (872) - Dacula, Georgia, USA - NOV 19, 2006
This was a hard beer to rate, mainly becaiuse it was like rating a glass of water.......not bad, just nothing to it. I have to say that this was the clearest beer I’ve ever seen. Poured from the bottle, it looked like a carbonated water, with little to no head or lacing. Aroam and taste were not necessarily bad, but again, nothing to them.
I really don’t know why people wouild spend money on this stuff. if you are that weight and health conscious, just drink water out of the tap, and forget about paying for the dark bottle and Michelob label.
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20 JAF737300 (1183) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - JAN 21, 2007
If you are a low carb diet than this ultra low carb non complex beer will do the job. terrible no....good no....drink cold!
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20 DruncanVeasey (4800) - NUNEATON, Conference North, Warwickshire, ENGLAND - JUN 7, 2007
5% bottle. Very disappointed. Considering the ratings I was expecting something spectacularly vile, but this just doesn’t deliver. Pale and wet. Very still and pallid. A not disgracefully dry, almost fruity aroma with a hint of Badger (the beer). Watery, rubbery, malty. A trace of alcohol, almost peach. Maybe allowing more sugar than normal to ferment has accidentally imparted a half-drinkable dryness, because this beer has a long way to go before it can truly considered a contender for The Worst Beer In The World title. Inoffensive considering it’s low carb.
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20 tjp68 (31) - Washington, Missouri, USA - MAY 11, 2007
Not much going on here...I can drink it with spicy food. I can also drink it when "low carbing".
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20 lb4lb (2021) - Austin, Texas, USA - JUL 23, 2007
UPDATED: AUG 4, 2007 Extremely light yellow color beer. Almost like water with lemon juice squirted in it... Very short lived head. An extremely subtle grain smell, and taste is one of the lightest of any beer I’ve ever had. Not bad tasting, but closer to water than beer as far as the taste. Still, I’d rather drink this over some other beers, actually.
|