RateBeer
Miller 1855 Celebration Lager 2.03 162

Miller 1855 Celebration Lager

 (RETIRED)
Percentile
5
overall

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag |
RatingsAverageScoreSeasonalABVStyle PctlServe in
1622/5.02.03/5.0Special4.85%41.9Dimpled mug, English pint, Lager glass, Shaker
Commercial Description:
A special beer created for the 150th anniversary of Miller Brewing Co.
 Most Recent Top Raters Highest Ratings Who's Rated This?  
hoplophobe (1), USA
does not count click to see why this rating of Miller 1855 Celebration Lager does not count
3.7 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
5/105/57/105/515/20
Mar 19, 2006  
It is the best tasting domestic beer being made today. It beats anyting being made by Bud, Coors and others.


LDawg (71), Rockport, Texas, USA
1.5 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
2/103/54/102/54/20
Mar 15, 2006  
15Mar06 It’s a more carbonated. I should save the money and bought reg. miller. At least the bottle is cool.


ninobrown (16), USA
0.8 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/102/51/101/51/20
Mar 10, 2006  
Standard macro appearance. Bottle’s not bad. Smell pretty standard macro - barely there. Flavor is offensive, strong corn or unpalatable malt without any hops balance. Not just bad, but bad for a bad category of beer. If this is what the folks drank in 1855, I’m surprised beer survived.


RyanTHC (38), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
1.8 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/102/53/102/58/20
Mar 9, 2006  
it’s real corny. better than highlife or genuine draft. no one i knew liked it that much.


 Aubrey (2782), Denver, Colorado, USA
1.2 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
2/102/52/102/54/20
Mar 7, 2006  
Noisy head formed and quickly faded just like soda. Clear, deep yellow hue. Nose was dusty and corny. Mouthfeel was fizzy with some weight to it. Malts were sweet (sugar water) and unexciting, with elements of popcorn and wet bread. Bitterness was mild; almost balancing, but not. Hops were stale, wet-tasting and herbal. Bleh. Can’t wait for the 200th anniversary, I tell ya.


 theshocker (329), Marietta, Georgia, USA
1.2 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
2/102/52/102/54/20
Mar 4, 2006  
I don’t have a lot to say about this beer, only two words really come to mind: corny, substandard.


 harlequinn (2745), Tacoma, Washington, USA
2 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
4/102/54/102/58/20
Mar 1, 2006  
A bolder maltier version of Miller Lite, if there is such a thing. Looks like everything you would expect, has some mustard seed spiciness, and clean in the finish.


 Jedsbrew (465), Rhineland, Missouri, USA
3.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
6/104/57/104/510/20
Feb 26, 2006  
Poured a fairly rich golden color with a short head and scant lacing. Whisper of hoppiness in the mild aroma. A little more body than the regular High Life, some malt on the sweet side with a light spicy hoppiness and clean finish. Not bad but disappointing for a 150th anniversary brew-I doubt anybody got arrested at this party.



We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

View Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

Share Your Opinion!
Get started reviewing beers at RateBeer.com now.

First, choose your user name

About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Log In | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Feedback?
Copyright © 2000-2010, RateBeer LLC