tnkw01 (1677) - Knoxville, Tennessee, USA - JUN 26, 2014
1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 2/20
Bottle. Just had this one after a Miller High Life Light and can honestly say I could not tell the difference. So, Iím going to copy and paste. Light golden color with an actually pretty decent head. Aroma, water a tad of grains. Taste water, a tad of grains. Is this beer?
ffaoe (390) - Moorestown, New Jersey, USA - JUN 14, 2014
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
No aroma. Golden and clear with little head. Very little taste and quite watery
TXBadger (2348) - Dallas, Texas, USA - JUN 5, 2014
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Kind of embarrassed Iíve had this, but I have. Very watered down without much flavor of anything in it.
wxman (1688) - OíFallon, Illinois, USA - JUN 1, 2014
2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Pours a bright clear pale gold with a so-so white head. Minor lacing. Grassy aroma. Taste is sweet pale malt and corn grits, then nothing. Well balanced, but watery. Taste is very brief with some dryness in the throat after the swallow. Refreshing, I suppose, but so is water.
Bulk_Carrier (3344) - Lake Champlain, Vermont, USA - MAY 31, 2014
1.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
As Iím about to review this, Iím already thinking of that damn song. Sucks to be me, letís get this over with so I can move on.
Iíve had this more than enough times in my life in a pint glass and a pilsener, there isnít much difference.
The appearance was a super light watery looking yellow color. Fast rising bubbles appeared into the quickly dissolving head. There was no lacing.
The smell was cooked corn if that.
The taste didnít really have anything. It had a super watery finish.
On the palate, it was more than light, this thing defined it.
Overall, well, its a Light Lager. Miller did what they wanted to do, produce a low calorie water with light "beer-like" qualities about it.
CpyNPrnT (584) - Indiana, USA - APR 6, 2014
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Aroma is...Taste is... Overall, there is hardly anything to this beer. Cutting calories sure, but not much else. Barely resembles an MGD (which I do enjoy).
jde123 (773) - Washington, Washington DC, USA - MAR 29, 2014
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
I think it has been rebranded, and I tend to like the new slightly retro branding on the cans. Flavorless beer, drink enough and youíll get drunk and not consume as many calories as normal...or so the adverts go... who knows.
Aubrey (3508) - Bellingham, Washington, USA - MAR 11, 2014
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
My mother-in-law left one of these in my fridge, so I thought Iíd taste a few ounces before throwing it out. It looks like watered-down apple juice and it is virtually headless. It has a bit of carbonation up front, but it turns watery toward the finish, and itís incredibly thin -- similar to carbonated water. Flavor-wise, it really doesnít have much to offer. There are weak notes of corn, syrup/sugar and tobacco, but theyíre faint (probably a good thing). Bitterness is barely discernible. After my fourth sip, I had had enough, and it was beginning to leave a bad taste in my mouth. What a lifeless and vapid beer.
LeonardoSV (3) - DOMINICAN REPUBLIC - MAR 7, 2014 does not count
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Sucks. You would be better off with water rather than this... I wouldnít even call it beer... "dirty water". Still does what it promises though, having a low calorie profile and whatever, so thatís why I give it a higher score.
bobbert (10) - - MAR 3, 2014
1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
This will receive ones across the board. The only reason it get a higher score overall is due to the cheap price and only having 64 calories.