Gypsy19 (726) - California, USA - JUN 24, 2008
1.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Little more than an Alcohol Delivery System, this is the palest of the pale and the least flavorful beer Iíve ever had. Thatís not to say iíts the worst: Thereís nothing to dislike here either because it simply a void; Utter nothingness.
patrick767 (3232) - fort wayne, Indiana, USA - JUN 22, 2008
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
UPDATED: JUN 25, 2008 bottle - Well, itís another fizzy yellow beer. This one brags about being the lowest calorie beer available. Itís clear and bubbly with a very mild grainy aroma. The flavor is sweet and light. As one would expect, thereís really not much to it. Itís not an awful taste, so I guess Iíve had worse beers. Actually I think itís a little more flavorful than the 68 calorie Beckís Light. Itís thin, watery, and there isnít much of an aftertaste. And yes, itís a different beer than MGD Light.
HonkeyBra (2857) - Lemont, Illinois, USA - MAY 30, 2008
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Pours a pale pale yellow with a light head, lots of fizz. Smells of corn. Tastes like watery corn. But, for 64 calories, what can you expect? Itís better than Bud Light.
msante79 (2187) - Mount Prospect, Illinois, USA - MAY 25, 2008
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
This is MGD light 64. Unsure if this is the same as MGD light. Aroma is water and sweet corn. Disgusting. Wy wife loves this shit as it only has sixty four calaries. What is the point.
valleyguzzler (26) - USA - MAY 2, 2008
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
They changed this beer to a watered down 65 calorie serving of fizz water. The original was at least drinkable...this stuff I would not even use to soak bratwurst in. Horrible stuff. Little to no flavor, lots of fizz, a slight aroma suggesting that beer might have once been in the can.
This is the beer equivalent of the "new coke".