clondest99 (12) - palo alto, California, USA - APR 8, 2002
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
The smell is pretty bad. I tried to drink one at the end of a party (funny enough that there was only Miller left)and have to confess that it was one of the few beers in my life I couldn’t finish.
maxhits (172) - Pico Rivera, California, USA - APR 8, 2002
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
The word “genuine” in MGD gives beer drinkers the impression that this is the “real deal” when it comes to beer. This is one of the top-10 domestic brands and it is Miller’s most popular full-caloried beer. That said... There is very little hop flavoring, no bitterness, and almost nothing in the finish that makes you stand up and take notice of what you just drank. Tastes like corn grits are used in the brewing.
fatherpierre (62) - Leeds, ENGLAND - APR 7, 2002
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Sweet and drinkable. Hardly a world beater but ok.
Tom Servo (424) - Arlington, Virginia, USA - APR 7, 2002
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Looks like piss, smells like piss, but you can buy enough with 10 bucks to not care. And that’s the American way.
grymy (105) - Bel Air, Maryland, USA - APR 6, 2002
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
the can and name make it look a whole hell of alot better then it actually tastes, rather drink the lite or champagne
JFGrind (1892) - Glenside, Pennsylvania, USA - APR 5, 2002
2.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 11/20
I do detect a slight malt taste and hop bitterness. however, this beer is made for mass consumption and works well especially when ice cold.
ultraspank (867) - Alverca, Lisboa, PORTUGAL - APR 4, 2002
2.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
*Re-Rate* Ok, now that I’ve been around the block, I wanted to get back to this one. This brew pours a clear light golden straw. The mostly diminishing frothy white head is average sized with fair lacing. The moderate nose is mostly hoppy with perfumed grass, citrus, spruce and resin. Also detected are traces of straw, hay, soap, and a white wine like quality. Let it be said that I don’t care for the nose of nearly all Am Standards, this being no exception. The light flavor is slightly unbalanced toward sweeness, but has a pleasent nutty yeasty finish if short. The light body is watery with lively carbonation, and has a light astringency to the finish. Bland. *Original Rate 2/24/02 *This is pretty decent mass production beer IMO. Of course slightly above average qualifies in that category. I’d consider myself a snob if I turned my nose up on this one.
Hmelsicky (39) - Maryland, USA - APR 3, 2002
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Just not a miller fan what can i say
MethodGod (7) - USA - APR 3, 2002 does not count
2.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Not a bad beer for the price. Smell is not all that great, but taste is decent. good party beer.
duece (103) - Waterford, Wisconsin, USA - APR 3, 2002
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Flavor is OK but stays too long with a very typical simple flavor.