carlitos99 (184) - The Big Apple, USA - JAN 24, 2002
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
This beer is gross and I’m so happy microbreweries have come along in the last few years to keep us from being shamed by the rest of the world. How Does stuff like this sell in a store with other beers to drink?!
mutant (854) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - JAN 24, 2002
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
A disturbingly bright yellow, like concentrated urine. If it looks like piss and tastes like piss it must be piss. Still better than bud.
Gooner (136) - Chatham, Ontario, CANADA - JAN 23, 2002
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
A standard American Draft.
BeerLimey (2154) - California, USA - JAN 22, 2002
0.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
UPDATED: MAY 10, 2003 My hopes should have vanished when I saw this beer supplied in a clear bottle, but this did not turn out to be an issue. Instead I was immediately disappointed upon pouring. It’s a pale yellowy golden color, extremely clear with good carbonation. There’s a decent initial foam but this quickly dissipates to something that looks more like a pond surface scum.
The nose is pretty much all-malt. It’s got a slight off-fruitiness, slightly grapey and a little vinuous.
The palate is light in body, with a slight smoothness. There’s some carbonation but really not as much as I would expect from this style.
A slight fruity initial flavor is even briefly appealing, with signs of apple, followed by a clean innocent malty-fruit middle. There are faint signs of hop in the finish but the aftertaste is very brief and mild. What does exist of the aftertaste is pretty unpleasant with a sour almost sickening sweetness.
211Gramma99 (38) - Chico, California, USA - JAN 19, 2002
4.4 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 18/20
great for the lake or BBQ
labattblueleaf (225) - Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - JAN 17, 2002
2.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
One of the ’better’ Miller products. I can drink this without hating it instantly. It has the noticeable flavor that all Miller products have, only not as strong which makes it one of the better Millers. I’d still try to steer clear.
sleepdirt (169) - Winnipeg, Manitoba, CANADA - JAN 16, 2002
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
We don’t need to be too intellectual about it...this is a waste of money:((
beckman99 (4) - Elizabeth Bay, AUSTRALIA - JAN 15, 2002 does not count
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
as with all american beers, ITS CRAP!!!
Charles20099 (8) - urbana, Illinois, USA - JAN 15, 2002 does not count
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
An OK beer. It’s the standard cheap beer that many people get around here.
666seth (222) - California, USA - JAN 15, 2002
1.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Hmmm... I’d say slightly better than Bud. Thats it.