IslandHaole (1228) - Mililani, Hawaii, USA - JUN 7, 2002
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Had a few free drink tickets at a club so I order a Becks or Heiniken, hmmm, only domestic beers with the ticket eh? OK, I slammed a few of these. It was that or Bud/Bud Light or Ice House, this was the lesser of the evils.
VTIrishman99 (64) - Virginia, USA - JUN 5, 2002
2.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
A pretty damn good beer. This was my bread and butter in high school when I had money and now that I’m in college, its not even considered buyable because I have even less money! The ’back in black’ look takes me back to the commercials where the guy is in a bar and the Allman Brothers song comes on and it starts snowing and somehow Rusty Wallace’s car just appears out of nowhere, ahh flashbacks.
bubslang (438) - Kentwood, Michigan, USA - JUN 3, 2002
1.1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
another laclluster american macro, barely better than bud, but still pretty bad
bigal9699 (152) - Orange County, California, USA - JUN 3, 2002
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Ok - if I had to choose from the 3 mainstream domestic beers (Bud, Coors or Miller), this would be the one. Goes down smoother than Bud or Coors - but still would take a Corona if I had to drink a light beer. Not bad - but geez, why even bother?
jaymobrown (1833) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - JUN 3, 2002
1.1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Preferable to other Miller products. Lacking in taste and aroma. Nothing special about the appearance. A weak beer all the way around. Gets worse as it gets warmer.
JohnDo2000 (99) - Metairie, Louisiana, USA - MAY 31, 2002
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Run of the mill, b ut still, you can’t knock the MGD too much. A lot more flavor than any of the other miller products, MGD gives a fairly decent taste with a lot of smoothness. Unfortunately, Miller isn’t too flavorfull to begin with.
obxdude10 (2252) - Pottstown, Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 30, 2002
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Sucks out of the bottle, not so bad on draft if you’re really dying of thirst, the only true innovation in American brewing by these guys is how they can make one pee immediately after downing one of their beers
austinpowers (2826) - New York, New York, USA - MAY 29, 2002
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
An average beer for average folks. It beats Miller High Life by a whisker.
Kemijaba99 (8) - USA - MAY 27, 2002 does not count
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Just plain nasty out of a can, tolerable out of a bottle. But nothing great.
Scooby (50) - Maryland, USA - MAY 24, 2002
1.1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20