Peter4Beer (11) - Wisconsin, USA - NOV 24, 2012
3.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
This is not a craft but mass produced, good news is every can is the same, so you know what you are getting
EvilPuppet99 (37) - Wisconsin, USA - NOV 13, 2012
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
I know Iím sort of commiting a sin beacuase Iím from WIsconsin but Iím not a miller fan. I turned 21 in St. Louis so budweiser and lagers are my preferences. Just couldnít get used to the aftertaste.
Brewticular (86) - - AUG 12, 2012
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Did not know they could make a very light beer become even lighter without pouring water directly into the bottle. I was apparently wrong. Taste like High Life with less carbonation.
PhatB420 (665) - Pittsfield, Massachusetts, USA - JUL 15, 2012
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
12oz can into a pint. This goes down nice when sipped and apprecieated. yes the corn and tin metalic presence is an offshot, but come on people, a drinkable "light" beer with the name high life? its been so long since a real high life Im confusing the two right now. but, the color is a golden yellow hay with a fake light tan. Taste is stale, cardboard and corn but with a corny sweetness that lingers. Mild throughout the sampling is the ever gilded and robust flavoring of salted sea water without the gull droppings. Drinkable? yes. highly satisfying, no. but rock it for what its worth. high life light is tolerable.
b3shine (5979) - Indiana, USA - JUL 1, 2012
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Bottle to pint. Looks like diluted urine. Smells and tastes cheap with a subpar mouthfeel. Not good, even as a light beer.
radarsock (1037) - Vermont, USA - JUN 28, 2012
1.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
This beer sincerely amuses me: High Life Light? I thought this was supposed to be remarked as the champagne of beer or something...
jmagnus87 (2742) - Rockford, Illinois, USA - JUN 26, 2012
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
12oz can poured into a shaker. Pours a clear gold with about a finger of white head. Aroma of corn and grains. Taste is corn and grains. Medium bodied with a thin watery texture. Fizzy carbonation and not much of a finish. Overall, probably one of the better "light" beers out there.
BeerDeltaBravo (53) - Oregon, USA - JUN 19, 2012
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Pours a hazy wheat-straw color with absolutely zero head. Half-decent lacing. Heavy musty aroma, with overtones of pine and cilantro. Nightmarish floral taste, and I also get some coffee and plum. Thin mouthfeel and saccharine finish.
brian60625 (742) - Illinois, USA - JUN 19, 2012
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
I admire how close they got this to taste like water. It was impressively bland, and I found it hard to believe they got a whole 4.2% abv in there. It tasted as if they took Miller Lite and mixed it three-to-one with water. The idea of a "light" beer is to reduce calories, and I think part of the enjoyment for dieters is the satisfaction of drinking something that tastes as if itís nothing. When youíre on a diet, you probably want to consume stuff that tastes as if there are no weight-gain consequences, or in other words, healthy beer. This beer achieves that level of sheer nothingness. Thereís no smell. Itís a diluted yellow. Hey, itís bubbly. There was no lacing, none whatsoever. I could barely pick up on a generic beer taste. Itís also probably popular with high schoolers who hate the taste of beer. This is the blandest beer Iíve ever had, and for that I say congratulations, but Iíll never be back. My rating is low because even in comparison to other pale lagers, a purposefully mild style, High Life Light cowers in the corner. This beer may very well be why there is a "1" available on the "Overall" category. For a second there, I thought this may finally be the right occasion to use it. Then again, maybe it COULD be worse, and for that I give it a two. Just as perfection is unachievable, maybe anti-perfection is too. Things could always be worse, which is the only reason this gets a 2 out of 20.
seymour (1516) - Maplewood, Missouri, USA - APR 23, 2012
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Tasted from can into tulip. It poured a clear golden color, perhaps oranger than most light lagers, with long-lasting white foam and lace. Mostly neutral aromas and flavors, but very faint mild malt, high-fructose corn syrup, distant hops. Rough, but not as horribly artificial or chemically as other macro adjunct light lagers. Light body, spritzy carbonation. Crisp, dry lager finish. Drinkable but progressively worsened as it warmed.