muzzlehatch (4840) - Beloit, Wisconsin, USA - JUN 17, 2002
0.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
More offensive than either MGD or Lite; is that enough info for you?
srqbeerman99 (15) - sarasota, Florida, USA - JUN 15, 2002
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Used to drink alot of it before I knew better. Has a funky after taste I canít quite put a finger on. If you have a choice, choose something else!
frankbooth (6) - Lynn, Massachusetts, USA - JUN 15, 2002 does not count
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Eh. Not too much flavor, a little too much carbonation. But its cheap and palatable. MGD has more taste and heft to it
MrRomero (1976) - Nolanville, USA - JUN 14, 2002
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
In high school (20 years ago) this was the shit. Quart bottles from the drive-in liquor store. Worthless nowadays.
mattduling (64) - Fairmont, West Virginia, USA - JUN 12, 2002
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
weusebio (69) - Portland, Oregon, USA - JUN 9, 2002
1.3 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20
Champagne of Beers? How about the Week Old Goatís Piss of Beers. I still donít see how anyone could drink this stuff.
adamcbowman (57) - Bowling Green, Ohio, USA - JUN 6, 2002
4.9 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 20/20
Possibly my favorite beer, great tasting, cans are great, bottles are better. If your looking for a good beer for a cheap price canít go wrong with the this one íthe chapagne of beersí. Great brew.
ultraspank (867) - Alverca, Lisboa, PORTUGAL - JUN 4, 2002
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
*Re-Rate* - This brew pours from the bottle a pale sparkling gold. The generous white frothy head is on the edge of creamy. The head is full lasting (I had over an inch of head at the bottom of the glass when finished) and has good lacing. The faint nose is very neutral with hints of caramel, flowers, pine and wet paper. The flavor is light, crisp and sweet (very pilsenerish) but lacks depth. The finish is average and flowery. The brew is light of body with a lively oily texture and feels clean at the finish. This is a highly quaffable brew for someone on a budget. I am doing a head to head between this and Budweiser today. *Original rating 2/8/02: 3-2-5-2-7; 1.9 (from memory)*I was weaned on this stuff. I have many childhood memories of family get-togethers watching the drunken derelict dagos stagger around with a can of either this, or Pabst Blue Ribbon in their hands. I have a much easier time choking this down than Bud.
JohnDo2000 (99) - Metairie, Louisiana, USA - MAY 31, 2002
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Ok, the champagne of beers..blablabla. Itís decent, but letís not talk it up so much. The only thing that makes it the íchampagneí of beers is its high carbonation and light body.
But not to bad mouth it too much, itís a decent brew with a distinctive taste. Good one to try.
Prostman (1077) - Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 30, 2002
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Best of the cheap stuff.