Dave Grubbs99 (3) - USA - APR 15, 2001 does not count
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Good, cheap fishing beer. But hey, after the third one what does it matter??
bettybeerballantine99 (3) - Illinois, USA - SEP 8, 2001 does not count
4.8 AROMA 10/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 19/20
A good, straightforward summer beer. No bullshit.
Mirage19099 (3) - W. Lafayette, Indiana, USA - JAN 12, 2002 does not count
4.2 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 19/20
I love this beer because its cheap and actually tasted good. By far the bst product from Miller and far better than most of the crap produced by AB and Coors. This is a great party beer.
peyote99 (3) - USA - APR 20, 2002 does not count
4.6 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 19/20
This beer is good. I am tired of beer snobs trying to put this beer down.
jkrzoska (3) - Brooklyn Park, Minnesota, USA - MAY 28, 2003 does not count
3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Like the review before me, it's not the nices to look at, and not the best smelling, yet it is the finest of the cheap american macrobrews.
dirtyjj (3) - Healdsburg, California, USA - JUL 7, 2003 does not count
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
For an everyday low price of just $6.99 (12pak), it's the best bottle 'o' piss for your buck.
pimpinya (3) - USA - FEB 11, 2004 does not count
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Safe enough to use in place of water in a fish tank! For a cheap macro, it's pretty good. Smooth and golden. good in a can, bottle, or keg.
molotov256 (3) - USA - JUL 26, 2004 does not count
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
A pretty damn unique beer, if you were to ask me! It’s so mellow in your mouth and goes down so smooth. I think the carbonation guy was half asleep when Miller invented this brew. It’s very very smooth going down; there’s not enough bubbles to really scratch or tickle your throat, but that’s okay with me. High Life also has a very earthy feel to it. It leaves an odd aftertaste, especially when it warms up. Kinda makes you feel like you were just eating dirt or sulfer or something weird like that. Even when I grab an ice cold can out of the fridge, it still tastes warm to me. It’s hard for me to rate this beer. There have been times when I loved a can of High Life right to death, and other times when I would have rather indulged in a glass of warm llama piss. I think my favorite thing about High Life is the 16 ounce can... it’s just so big! lol... and getting 4 sixteen ounce cans for $2.50 at an expensive gas station doesn’t hurt, either. I think that if you’re looking for a real cheap beer that doesn’t make you feel like you just weeded your garden with your tounge, Milwaukee’s Best may be a better suggestion, but one should not pay any disrespect to ’the champagne of beers’.
badandyruh (3) - USA - SEP 29, 2005 does not count
4.6 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 19/20
I’m probablly one of very few people on Earth that loves this beer. Lives up to the name Champagne of Beers. It has such a unique taste for a Lager I’ve never tasted in another. Great with a burger. Oh, and is there a better beer commercial then the High Life ones? I think not. Cheers
sturcott (3) - Brighton, Massachusetts, USA - FEB 24, 2006 does not count
3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Ok, here goes. This is an awesome mass-produced cheap beer. Seems like saying it is the best ’Yugo’ around, which is pretty true. However, you could dupe quite a few hipsters by exchanging a pint of High Life with their ’$5 Stellas’. Sometimes has an odd mustiness. Try the ’Stella Exchange/Swap’ it’ll work, I swear. If there isn’t enough head, add some merrange or foam, I guess. Follow the comments below it is indeed sweet, tastes a bit like creamed corn, and better in bottles.