alagnak (324), Littleton, Colorado, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 | Jun 6, 2009 12 oz can @ my in-laws, since it’s all they have. Smells like water that was once running in a river somewhere vaguely near a malt factory. Tastes like metallic corn cereal dunked in sparkling water. At one point, I thought I may have tasted a hop (remember - ’’triple hopped"), so i gave it an extra point for that. One of the poorer light beers, which is saying something. Onslow (174), Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 | Jun 6, 2009 Not a big fan of the style, but if you want ot make a brew that is low calorie and low ABV, this one is about as good as you can get. Some flavor, not much, slighlty reminiscent of beer... bradner (25), Oswego, Illinois, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Jun 5, 2009 Absolute garbage. Tastes like you are you drinking bad water. About as clear as water too. May be suitable for drinking games only. GG (1615), NorCal, California, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 | Jun 5, 2009 How do you rate a "lite" pale lager (by the way, was this word created ’specially for Miller?) like this? There’s nothing to it, but perhaps that’s the pinch? Like watching a bad magician, or some crappy bar band in the middle of nowhere. You kinda expect it to be bad right? Well, if you consider this a "lite" beer, then Miller has hit a home run.
Drank while watching the Lakers vs. Magic game and suprised to see I haven’t rated it yet. The beer poured out a light yellow color, clear, medium carbonation present and a 2" foamy white head. The head seemed alsmost like cotton candy, just not much there. Aroma was...nothing. Zip. Nada. Smelled like air. Flavor was light corn/cereal and not much else. Not much else to it really. CUJO (339), Brooklyn, New York, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | May 30, 2009 The ultimate in light beer. Goes with anything, anywhere, anytime! Very commericail, watery, non filling, light in taste and color. Can you say beer pong? rustychiles (1016), Mesa, Arizona, USA
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 | May 25, 2009 Pours a light golden color with a white head. Aroma is malt, water and not much else. Flavor is slightly sweet, lots of carbonation, water and not much else. I guess this is refreshing on a hot day, but it’s so bland and forgettable that I really don’t get the point. Still not a bad or offensive beer, just not that great. Savvy1982 (303), Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/20 | May 22, 2009 Updated: Jun 1, 2009Can. Absolutely nothing to this beer. This is the same score I feel I would give to a glass of tap water. Nothing at all to it, but not offensive in any way either. Re-rated higher, because there are very definitely worse beers out there. Just nothing. WVHouseofBeer (357), Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 | May 22, 2009 This is one of the worst American macro lagers, and that’s saying a lot, because that means it is one of the worst of the worst.
|