kumite56 (473) - Cordova, Tennessee, USA - SEP 17, 2002
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Ok suffice it to say that this is not a very good beer. Had this one after a great dove hunt in 90 degree weather. In this case this numbingly cold beer was probably as good as it gets. As such it still is pretty poor. Semis sweet, fizzy and watery. Some bitterness with no malt and hence no complexity. I would have one again in the same circumstances but will never pay for one.
getsomeplaya99 (19) - Waukegan, Illinois, USA - SEP 14, 2002
2.4 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 20/20
I dont know how these catagories were created. Why not add some that are useful like smoothness and poundablity. This is the smoothest beer out there especially on tap. Im not alone on feeling this way. This is the number one beer in the county and i live in the richest county in Illinois. This outsells Bud by 8 to 1 and the imports well .... Plain and simple if it wasnt brewed in Milwaukee it isnt worth drinking.
BeermanLayton (33) - Rohnert Park, California, USA - SEP 11, 2002
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Iím Rusty Wallace fan but not of his beer. MGD is much better.
Aesir (130) - Tustin, California, USA - SEP 11, 2002
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
At $8.99 per 12 pack this beer is overpriced. Iíd like to find this Mr. Miller so I can slap him very hard in the face. If I could somehow devise a tube that traveled from my genitals to my mouth, it could be Miller time whenever I needed to urinate.
Jayb0 (1103) - Cherry Hill, New Jersey, USA - SEP 9, 2002
1.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
slightly preferable to bud light. Must be ice cold. Can be enjoyable as a thirst quencher. Spicy food will mask aftertaste. Finish quickly. Best when free. Much more preferable than bad full-caloried beers.
gregmsu99 (12) - USA - SEP 7, 2002
2.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 5/20
I like the beer it is cheap and iím a college student can drink alot of it at a party and still be not shitty enough to make an ass of myself
Turtboy (120) - Lucasville, Ohio, USA - SEP 7, 2002
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Too weak, another beer that requires a case to get buzzed. By the way, why "LITE" instead of "LIGHT". Sucks either way.
metaldust (30) - Missouri, USA - SEP 6, 2002
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
No taste at all. Not even as good as Coors Light.
adamcbowman (57) - Bowling Green, Ohio, USA - SEP 6, 2002
2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Miller Lite, probably, next to Bud, the most advertised beer. A bit watery, but still not bad to stop from drinking it. Itís mostly seen at parites by the case or at softball games, but for the price it seems o.k. Overall, i can stand it.
PorterPounder (6408) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - SEP 5, 2002
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
UPDATED: FEB 15, 2006 Rerate Hair tonic-like aroma, light golden appearance, slight white head, slightly grassy flavor, some metal, hint of hops. Thinnish mouthfeel. Still donít get the attraction of this beer. Original 1.9 Thereís a reason I waited until no. 131 to rate one of the worldís top selling beers - it is really no good. Proof that marketing is everything with the big boys - barely discernable beer taste - slight skunky odor to it - almost flat tasting. Sad to think that some people never venture farther than this in their beer drinking. Goes down smooth though - no flavor to get in the way.