papajijo (22) - USA - SEP 4, 2002
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
this is the beer that i started drinking with. i cannot thank miller enough for this. the taste of this beer is irrelavent to me because it has sentimental meaning to me. but i think the taste is good for an American beer.....keep on drinking
SiddFinch (155) - Pen Argyl, Pennsylvania, USA - SEP 3, 2002
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Had this at a picnic yesterday. Worse of the three American Lights. This has an aftertaste that reminds me each sip, exactly what I’m drinking.
BillKismet (3769) - Seattle, Washington, USA - SEP 2, 2002
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Very carbonated, light gold, and with a fluff head that collapses like the Anaheim Angels every September. In my mind, this beer vacillates between Am. standard and Am. light as far as mouthfeel and heaviness are concerned--but it is probably not worth quibbling over the difference between light and ultra light. Finishes with a flat, cardboard feel on the palate--at least this beer is clean and crisp.
IneedAbuheer (69) - Ingleside, Illinois, USA - SEP 2, 2002
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Not much of any flavor to talk about - useful when you’re looking for quantity, not quality. For the battle of the U.S. macrobrews, I give my nod to Bud.
Nuffield (4020) - Roseville, Minnesota, USA - AUG 31, 2002
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
UPDATED: MAR 7, 2003 My friend was drinking this, so I partook. Terrible. No flavor, like water, and just really awful. Re-rate: I had a can at a fish fry and it was very thin, I could see to the bottom of the can after opening it! White head, but actually not an offensive flavor, sort of like MGD made palatable.
007lund (92) - Ann Arbor, USA - AUG 28, 2002
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Might quite possibly be the worst beer I’ve ever had. Almost water, with a very weak taste. The only thing it’s got going for it is the fantastic marketing. I wouldn’t offer this to guests unless their sole purpose was to slam back beers until they passed out, and that’s only because the stuff’s not expensive.
jcalbi (380) - Medford, New Jersey, USA - AUG 26, 2002
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Vintage dated Super Bowl XXXII (1998?). Clearing out the fridge before the move. Rancid foamy crap. Guess I missed the best before date by about 36 MONTHS!!!
ToadMan (559) - Washington, Washington DC, USA - AUG 23, 2002
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20
Very watery, not much flavor at all. But nothing offensive, cheap, and it gets you drunk.
TMP8899 (6) - Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA - AUG 22, 2002 does not count
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Much better than budlight or coors light. Best light beer available.
Ringo (963) - Loveland, Colorado, USA - AUG 22, 2002
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Re-rate. I was unfair to this the first time, I must have been in a critical mood. It’s no worse than Bud. I like it cold in the can with fried chicken. What can I say.