GPyott (67) - Kenosha, Wisconsin, USA - JUN 5, 2002
1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Not quite as bad as Coors Light, but not much better either. This is one of my friend’s beer-of-choice… yes, we question his sexuality too. If you are looking for a decent light (should one actually exist), you’d be well advised to try Molson Light.
samustdog (73) - USA - JUN 5, 2002
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
One of my first few beers....sigh, memories. That doesn’t change the fact that this is just about as bad as most of the major American ’college’ beers. Leave this one at college, please.
JohnDo2000 (99) - Metairie, Louisiana, USA - MAY 31, 2002
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Great for festivals/ballgames, etc, but not a bar drink at all. Don’t quite understand the big hype over all the miller products, but its a decent light beer.
Prostman (1077) - Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 30, 2002
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Ya know my buddy ’Moose’ (The name should say enough) swears by this monkey piss. He always tells me that ’He can’t drink the laaaaagers’ with a horrible PA accent. And I always tell him that this is a form of a lager, but he never believes me. But I’ll leave that damn fool to drink this foolish crap. This isn’t for me.
Kemijaba99 (8) - USA - MAY 27, 2002 does not count
1.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Better than bud light, but nothing to get in a fuss about. It’s a good ’common’ beer.
coachmark34 (39) - central Illinois, USA - MAY 22, 2002
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
Yuk. No flavor, no aroma, no character. A guy must have to get used to this and not drink anything else to actually purchase this stuff. I will say it’s a step up from Natural Light, though.
BigBoi99 (19) - Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 20, 2002
2.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
It’s ok. Did anyone else notice the metal like taste that is most apparent in the can. Hence the nickname ’DeadlyMetally’
bubslang (438) - Kentwood, Michigan, USA - MAY 20, 2002
1.1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Overall a poor beer, but still better than bud light, if its real hot out, and this beer is really cold, can quench your thirst, but otherwise its not worth drinking
VENOM (941) - Connecticut, USA - MAY 20, 2002
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Free sample, via a wedding reception. Actually has some color, with trace yellow tints. Foamy quickly fizzling white head. Moderate carbonation. Aroma of some strange plastic laden chemical, corn syrup and light pilsner malts. Taste is heavily carbed with specs of sweetness and a malt depth that is intolerable, even for a Light beer. Even my wife asked me why I even bothered. Why? A friend walked by and said ’Oh good god man what are you drinking?’. Enough said.
TheDean (786) - MIlwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - MAY 17, 2002
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Ok, every once in a while you need a macro brew, and Miller light and MGD are the two beers that are the tops in that catagory. What beer is supposed to be without the frills and BS.