neilrichards (191) - Leicestershire, ENGLAND - JUN 8, 2002
2.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Its easy to drink gallons of this stuff - although that doesnt alter the fact that it tastes like cheap, bog standard lager. On to avoid.
VTIrishman99 (64) - Virginia, USA - JUN 5, 2002
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
After 4 years of college, i’ve had enough miller lite to have my face pictured on Rusty Wallace’s car. However, I’m not a huge fan, in fact, I see little point in wasting so much dough on a beer that tastes only minimally better than the cheaper beers, so usually I pass right by Miller Lite and grab something else. Overall though, its a status beer for yuppies and college girls, so I try to avoid it.
GPyott (67) - Kenosha, Wisconsin, USA - JUN 5, 2002
1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Not quite as bad as Coors Light, but not much better either. This is one of my friend’s beer-of-choice… yes, we question his sexuality too. If you are looking for a decent light (should one actually exist), you’d be well advised to try Molson Light.
samustdog (73) - USA - JUN 5, 2002
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
One of my first few beers....sigh, memories. That doesn’t change the fact that this is just about as bad as most of the major American ’college’ beers. Leave this one at college, please.
JohnDo2000 (99) - Metairie, Louisiana, USA - MAY 31, 2002
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Great for festivals/ballgames, etc, but not a bar drink at all. Don’t quite understand the big hype over all the miller products, but its a decent light beer.
Prostman (1077) - Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 30, 2002
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Ya know my buddy ’Moose’ (The name should say enough) swears by this monkey piss. He always tells me that ’He can’t drink the laaaaagers’ with a horrible PA accent. And I always tell him that this is a form of a lager, but he never believes me. But I’ll leave that damn fool to drink this foolish crap. This isn’t for me.
Kemijaba99 (8) - USA - MAY 27, 2002 does not count
1.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Better than bud light, but nothing to get in a fuss about. It’s a good ’common’ beer.
coachmark34 (39) - central Illinois, USA - MAY 22, 2002
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
Yuk. No flavor, no aroma, no character. A guy must have to get used to this and not drink anything else to actually purchase this stuff. I will say it’s a step up from Natural Light, though.
BigBoi99 (19) - Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 20, 2002
2.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
It’s ok. Did anyone else notice the metal like taste that is most apparent in the can. Hence the nickname ’DeadlyMetally’
bubslang (438) - Kentwood, Michigan, USA - MAY 20, 2002
1.1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Overall a poor beer, but still better than bud light, if its real hot out, and this beer is really cold, can quench your thirst, but otherwise its not worth drinking