RateBeer
overall
0
2
style

bottled
common

on tap
common

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 2208   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.38   EST. CALORIES: 126   ABV: 4.2%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
This carefully crafted pilsner uses the finest ingredients and brewing techniques to ensure rich, full-bodied beer taste at only 96 calories.


0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
countpudyoola99 (10) - USA - AUG 9, 2001
This is sugar water. Should be reserved for hummingbird feeders only.

0.9
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 1/20
Elladan99 (14) - USA - AUG 2, 2001

0.9
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 3/20
Osmin99 (120) - Bloomington, Indiana, USA - AUG 1, 2001

1.8
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 6/20
crunked2399 (34) - Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 29, 2001
Ahh, what fond memories. Two dollar picthers on Thurday at players. The many, many keg parties with hosts decent enough not to serve Natty or Iron Shitty. Drunken women everywhere. . . . . . . . Then I graduated, got a job and some sense. This crap isn’t worth two dollars. Gives you gas something terrible. If I make a return to PSU, I’m forking out the extra dollar for some Yuengling. But it will always have a special place in my heart. Thanks for the memories Miller Lite!! That’s all you’ll be to me!!

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
tbookman (618) - Ephrata, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 26, 2001
Somewhere someone coined the term ’macro-swill’ in a review. That phrase applies here. Yucky stuff - nasty aroma, bad watery/rice taste, bland appearance...bad bad bad

2.7
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 11/20
npdempse (934) - St. Petersburg, Florida, USA - JUL 23, 2001
I think the heat was getting to me. Had this on a 90+ degree day in outrageous humidity, and found it to have a crisp, refreshing flavor. I’ll try it some other time again to see if that was just an effect of heat stroke.

2.7
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
avidbeerdrinker (17) - Champaign, Illinois, USA - JUL 22, 2001
It tastes more expensive than it is, and it is a better beer in bottle than on tap. I think because it has a more carbonated bite in bottle.

1.1
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 5/20
MilkmanDan (1943) - Eagan, Minnesota, USA - JUL 9, 2001
It’s the best light macrobrew crapbeer out there, I guess. I mean, when your competition is Bud Light or Coors Light, it’s not saying much, but Miller Lite is at least marginally better than a sharp stick in the eye.

2.1
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
bcsbadboys99 (4) - USA - JUL 5, 2001 does not count
Looking for something to drink after a sporting event? Better choice than Bud Light.

0.7
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 3/20
BeerLimey (2154) - California, USA - JUL 5, 2001
UPDATED: MAY 29, 2003 Not much to offer, clean tasting and refreshing, but too watery. It's better than Bud Light.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page   1 « 213 214 215  216  217 218 219 » 221


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50