Apache (18), Georgia, USA
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 5/20 | Apr 12, 2008 Pretty awful, but it was the keg beer of choice for college parties as it was a step above keystone lite. decaturstevo (1980), decatur, Tennessee, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | Apr 11, 2008 btl thanks to jcwattsrugger a gag gift (no pun intended). Did a blind tasting of 4 light beers. Miller lite, Bud light, Straub light, and a Fla lite beer that was mislabled at the factory. It work out kinda like this:
Miller lite 3.2
Bud light 3.0
Straub light 2.9
Fla lite beer that was mislabled at the factory 2.5
Hands down the ML was the better beer not a lot of flavor, not a lot of body, but carbonation was decent. It looked good it smelled like I guess it should. I’m just not crazy about the style. For those of you who wonder why some people don’t rate to style? I still don’t know I try so there is a 1.5 factor in my rating multiply these rates by 1.5 and it will give you the number you want. thanks John:) cheerstevo EricE (450), Fairfax, Virginia, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 | Apr 11, 2008 I have been drinking good beer for several years and started rating several months ago. I decided to return to my roots for rating number 100; those years in college of drinking the cheap stuff. So I went to happy at a local bar, explained the situation and received a blank stare from the server, "You’re 100th rating is going to be a pint of Miller Lite at Applebee’s in College Park, Maryland?" I carefully evaluated my pint, scribbled some notes on a napkin, and quickly chugged down the rest so I could move onto to better beers. changeup45 (788), Orlando, Florida, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 5/20 | Apr 10, 2008 I find Coors Light and Bud Light better. Not good. If you must, go for it but it’s a bad beer. AlcoholChair (10), Godfrey, Illinois, USA
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Apr 10, 2008 This beer has a poor taste compared to others in its class. Miller cannot contend with Budweiser. esjaygee (1519), Oak Creek, Wisconsin, USA
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Apr 9, 2008 Very pale yellow with quickly dissipating white head. Weak corn aroma to go with ultra watery palate. This is some awful crap! This gets mass marketed to the public and they drink it up… why? The lame ads probably? Tastes great? I think not… it’s the worst beer I have ever tasted in my life. It was tough choking down a few sips before I tossed the end of it. Luckily it was free. Matt991 (5), Orange, California, USA does not count | 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 5/20 | Apr 7, 2008 Miller holds a place with most American light lagers in being very tasteless. Compared to most other American Light Lagers, Miller does however have a bit more of a hop flavor. The color is pale yellow and there is no real aroma. bluemooner (230), Blaine, Minnesota, USA
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Apr 7, 2008 Updated: Apr 1, 2009Pours a clear yellow color with thin, fizzy head. tastes very watered down. Bad, even for a light beer.
|