djc920 (21), New Jersey, USA
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 2/5 | 2/20 | Aug 15, 2009 Terrible. Tastes like hay, shit aftertaste. Don’t waste your time unless you’re playing drinking games. zapprentice (310), East Setauket, New York, USA
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 | Aug 13, 2009 Pretty awful beer. Typical light beer though for a domestic brewer. No flavor, no aroma grebs (71), Ohio, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 2/10 | 3/5 | 2/20 | Aug 11, 2009 Somehow worse than the other comparable crappy American macros (Bud and Coors). Triple hops? Ha. Never an acceptable drink. TreborWhip (79), Reading, Pennsylvania, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 | Aug 10, 2009 Typical large brewery lite beer made for the masses of beer guzzlers. Don’t get me wrong, if I’m out with the boys to tie one on, then this is usually what I order. Kind of like drinking water with alcohol in it. Duhast500 (176), , Massachusetts, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Aug 10, 2009 Poured into a pint glass from 12oz can.
The color is pale yellow. Is a bit fizzy with a dark white head.
The smell is of light malt and hops but not very strong.
The taste is a bit watered down but is crisp. Has a malty flavor but very subtle.
This beer is good beer for going to a race since only cans are allowed. Also good for camping. This brew is available everywhere and is usually at a low price. Good for a low budget.
darn1207 (543), Tallahassee, Florida, USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | Aug 8, 2009 I think this is the first time I’ve rated one of the macros I grew up on but hardly ever touch anymore. Yeah, not so good: pale malts, sweet corn and grain with a hint of metal. But I can always drink one - like riding a bike or something. Gets a bump in score purely for nostalgia sake. MrRoss (617), Delta, British Columbia, Canada
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/20 | Aug 7, 2009 What the hell was I thinking (in 1975)? Regular Miller was okay (just); Billy Martin and Micky Spillane duped me - this was a bottle of sh*te. Only took me 3 years to admit it. Too bad, though - they had great TV ads. twistedviews (67), California, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 | Aug 5, 2009 not the best light beer, especially for its price. they need to make it cheap. too bad commercial beers as disappointing as this are millionaires who squeeze cash out of you for weak shit
|