Tmoney99 (13584) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - NOV 4, 2006
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Can. Poured pale color with a minimal fizzy white head that diminished quickly with virtually no lacing. Light grainy sweet aroma. Light body with a watery texture and soft carbonation. Light sweet flavor with a light sweet finish of short duration. I would not recommend this to a freind.
Lemke10 (971) - Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA - SEP 9, 2016
1.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
24oz bad boy drank straight from the can. Very slight grain aroma. The taste is sweet, malty, but also fairly weak.
GTAEgeek (1961) - Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA - APR 6, 2016
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
12 oz. can, "thanks" to jackl. Clear, pale, bubbly yellow, with a medium, bubbly, off-white head that abates quickly. Nose of Saaz, corn syrup, and wet blankets. Sweet and syrupy, with no bitterness. At least the aftertaste is mild and not unpleasant. Light body, creamy, lightly effervescent, and a bit crisp. This is a poor, cheap lager. Overly sweet, with all the aroma that crappy adjuncts will get you.
phaleslu (9413) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - MAR 2, 2016
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
12 oz. can shared at the Hyatt one night during RBWG, and that night was called Wednesday. But who shared this? No one knows. Doesn’t fucking matter. Pours a pale clear gold with a white head that settles into a ring and film, leaving spots of lace in the glass. Notes of corn, metal, apples, minerals, and wet hay. Light-bodied, with moderate to medium carbonation and a clean, crisp mouthfeel. It’s okay. Most beers with "Milwaukee" in the name are going to give you a mixed bag, brother.
Ferris (12879) - Burnaby, British Columbia, CANADA - FEB 4, 2016
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Can - Hi octane notes. Pale cold with a small white head. Sweet corn and apple notes. Much milder than the nose.
Leighton (18668) - London, Greater London, ENGLAND - FEB 4, 2016
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Can shared during RBWG 2016. Pours clear yellow with a creamy white head. The nose has some sharp sugary cereal, corn, white bread. Medium to heavy sweet flavor with more basic cereal, light paper, straw, meringue, white bread. Medium bodied with delicate carbonation. Sugary finish, mellow paper, no hops, some white rice, cereal. Not terrible.
JulienHuxley (5606) - Trois-Rivičres, Quebec, CANADA - FEB 4, 2016
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 3/20
Can shared. Very pale clear gold pour with thin white head. Aroma is fruity, apple jolly ranchers, corn syrup. Taste is super sweet, candy, apple. Palate is light bodied, watery with light.
Homer321 (4312) - Melboring, Florida, USA - FEB 4, 2016
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Bottle at RBWG 2016. Thanks jack! Nose is mostly candied Apple and soft honey. Super clear, pale yellow. Taste follows with light sugar tones as well. Not bad.
Theydon_Bois (17214) - Hazlemere, the lower Xhitlerns, Buckinghamshire, ENGLAND - FEB 4, 2016
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
Can split in the hotel lobby, RBWG ’16, 03/02/16.
Pale yellow blonde with a moderate off White covering.
Nose is buttery, grain, cereal, vanilla, pale malt.
Taste comprises corn husk, light vanilla, grain, cereals, pale malt, grass.
Medium bodied, fine carbonation, semi drying close.
Bloom ooh giggle.
crossovert (11398) - Illinois, USA - NOV 10, 2015
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 9/20
710ml can. Pale pour no head aroma of sweet paper glue. Flavor is minerally and not at all that offensive.
Frank (4022) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - OCT 6, 2015
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
You see this can and it just exudes pure class. I’m speechless. The beer inside is wonderful as well. It’s got a metallic note which seems to come from hops, which is a good sign because that means they used hops or some sort of hop extract in the making of this beverage. It’s a bit sweet and very fizzy, which makes it come off a bit watery. The taste is not altogether bad tasting w/ lost of mineral character from the water. Normally, this mineral taste is something I associate w/ very fine pilseners and the like but I suppose water softening costs money so I’m unsurprised to find it in a cheap beer also. Overall, I reckon this beer is kinda good but in a bad way.