Metalchopz (2012) - Cantley, Quebec, CANADA - JAN 18, 2012
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Originally rated October 2005. Bought this one in Montreal in a convenient store. Pours a golden colour with good carbonation. The white head is decent but does not stay long. Nice fresh smell of malt at first, then corn and alcohol shape up... just like malt liquor. Watery mouthfeel and very dry aftertaste. Not much taste, just light malt and corn. Nothing offensive though. Good for drunk swilling.
Radek Kliber (6287) - Toronto (Can) Krotoszyn (Pol), POLAND - SEP 5, 2005
1.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Pale gold, white crown on top. Medium light carbonation. Similar aroma to Blue Dry, sweet light mineral character, fain hop aroma. Sweeter than Blue Dry, but leaves unpleasant malt aftertaste. Chewy, sticky. Short finish. I guess that is was aimed for, easy drinkable beer for masses.
collieman (191) - montreal, Quebec, CANADA - AUG 19, 2005
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
This is not a good beer. This is a very VERY bad beer. Pours a very pale straw yellow, that is just slightly cloudier than clear. High carbonation, if you want head, shake the can. Taste is awful. Corn and grain alcohol is all there is. No undertones, no malt or hop chacter, nothin. Aftertase is sweet boose, that’s it, no more. Doesn’t realy get you drunk, it gets you sick. I belive this is not a pale lager, but instead a malt liqour. Bad bad BAD. Cheers