GTCruiser01 (105) - California, USA - MAR 4, 2012
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
If you are mowing the lawn and need a substitute for water, then this beer will do.
AWMiller (512) - Mansfield, Texas, USA - JAN 24, 2012
3.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
BOAB (beer on a budget)!! cheap - refreshing - cheap. good standard fare for the bbq/fish fry. I like this one as it is a tad bit sweeter than most macro (adjunct) beers.
JHunter (676) - British Columbia, CANADA - JAN 23, 2012
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
pale yellowish beer thin white head no aroma worth noting same with flavour
Chudwick (2850) - Cincyucky, Kentucky, USA - JAN 21, 2012
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
24oz can - pours pale gold with quickly diminishing white head and very light lacing. Nose is corn and cardboard. Aroma is a little hoppy. Taste is mildly bitter and faintly sweet. Light body and thin texture. Burpy. A very neutral beer after a few gulps. A good value.
Rodriguez (357) - Quito, ECUADOR - JAN 16, 2012
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
The cheapest beer I had some summers in the USA. Awful corn beer. I wll always remember a the worst beer I have ever have.
RONCOD (238) - Uledi, Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 16, 2011
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Clear yellow color with almost no head. The taste was kind of sweet and watery. Drinkable beer if nothing else is available.
Big_Pete (34) - Missouri, USA - NOV 8, 2011
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
The beast. The beast is pretty beastly, and not in a good way either. This beer gave me nightmares, and the can was talking to me. Never will be having this again. Bottle.
jmagnus87 (2912) - Rockford, Illinois, USA - OCT 28, 2011
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
12oz can from Pick’s poured into a shaker. Pours a clear pale gold with about a finger of bright white head. Aroma of light hops with some metallic notes. Taste is very lightly bitter. Metal with a little bit of skunk at the end. Light bodied with a thin yet somewhat creamy texture. Fizzy carbonation and not much of a finish. Overall, it’s really not that bad. After an 11 hour workday, this kinda hits the spot. I would take this over any "light" beer any day.
seymour (1897) - Maplewood, Missouri, USA - OCT 28, 2011
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
UPDATED: FEB 6, 2012 Tasted from tall-boy can into standard pint glass. Poured a crystal-clear light golden color with a huge, creamy, white head and even some nice lace. Rough fermented corn aroma, virtually no hops, faint grain, mild malt, and peppery lager phenols. Flavor was grainy, a little gritty or dusty, mellow with corn-grits mouthfeel and a crisp, dry finish. Bad but surprisingly drinkable, perhaps not as purely awful as I remembered.
Elderbeerman (7) - Rockton, Pennsylvania, USA - OCT 20, 2011 does not count
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, as the old cliche goes...and here we have the Beauty that IS the Beast! Taste is so very subjective. I like this one. I have always. It’s a great session beer, at this abv level. It’s got a rather mild flavor- that holds up, by the way, compared to any of the other pale lagers: Coor’s, Bud, PBR, Miller, etc. So much of what we "taste" is actually what we expect, in our brains. I like it. I like a lot of other brands and styles for as many different reasons as there are brands and styles of beer. (Just give me a break with all the beer snobbery. I’m just sayin’...)