RateBeer
overall
n/a
0
style

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 880   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.1/5   EST. CALORIES: 129   ABV: 4.3%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Using select pale malt, cereal grains and yeast, this naturally hopped beer features premium taste, but not at a premium price.


1
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 3/20
WillyTheFrog99 (31) - Durham, New Hampshire, USA - MAR 13, 2002
Better than Keystone Ice, as far as frat beer goes, but basically pisswater. I’m sorry to anyone living in Milwaukee if that’s their best shot.

1.6
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 5/20
CrotchMonkey99 (40) - Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA - MAR 6, 2002
this beer is not good...its cheap as they say...but its cheap for a reason i guess

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
mightymaxx99 (5) - USA - MAR 5, 2002 does not count
The ’Beast’ will chew you up and spit you out....nasty

0.8
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
craybigkid99 (27) - Oregon, USA - MAR 5, 2002
The can looks kinda cool I suppose. Somebody kill this ’beast’. Icktar.

0.7
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 3/20
estoppel (1028) - Buffalo, New York, USA - MAR 4, 2002
UPDATED: NOV 7, 2003 The deScription says that this product 'features premium taste, but not at a premium price.' It's all about understanding the macrobrew definition of 'premium.' After all, if 'premium' meant 'good,' it would say 'features good taste, but not at a good price,' which obviously isn't the intent here. Substitute 'bad' for 'premium,' and you get 'features bad taste, but not at a bad price,' which seems to be the actual intent. You can probably figure out the macrobrew definition of 'best' from this example.

1.2
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 7/20
I.C.suds (189) - Da U.P. eh?, Michigan, USA - MAR 3, 2002
This is miller high life at a chaeper price! Honest. Take some to the sauna and you’ll see.

4.6
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 9/10   PALATE 5/5   OVERALL 19/20
bighair (51) - Hamilton, Ohio, USA - MAR 3, 2002
the best way to gain 7 pounds in one night.

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
CIVICRACER99 (15) - USA - MAR 2, 2002
This is a beer to try to set a record for most beers bonged at a time in the frat house

0.6
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 2/20
Primobang (18) - New Hampshire, USA - MAR 1, 2002
This is the worst beer I’ve had and I am in college so I’ve had alot of crappy beer

0.7
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 2/20
muzzlehatch (4420) - Burlington, Vermont, USA - MAR 1, 2002
There are many, many beers vying for the ’least character’ and ’most unmemorable’ awards in the Ratebeer hall of fame. I nominate this sterling candidate, which I often find waiting for me when I visit my parents back in southern Wisconsin. 5.99 a case? Heaven to the cheap, ’of-the-people’ Republican.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 73 74 75  76  77 78 79 » 88


Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2016,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50