PorterPounder (7404) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - OCT 19, 2002
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
I’ve had worse; especailly considering I paid the same for a six that I usually pay for a pint at the pub. However, I’m afraid the remaining 5 will darken the back of my fridge for quite awhile though. Aroma - almost non-existent - but beats skunky. Head - foamy white and quickly diminshing with no lace. Flavor - while almost non-exisistent - is smooth throughout. Worth the 50 cents a can I paid for it!
radagast83 (7388) - Alexandria, Virginia, USA - SEP 4, 2005
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
UPDATED: NOV 3, 2005 Words can not comprehend how bad this beer really is. No wonder the nickname "beast" is so often used for this "beer". I’ve been told they make a "chest" of this drink that you can purchase 30 of them for 10 dollars. I wonder why. Don’t even bother unless you have enough adventure to say you’ve had the worst beer on the face of the planet
Ernest (7344) - Boulder, Colorado, USA - AUG 1, 2002
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Head is initially small, frothy, white, mostly diminishing. Body is clear light yellow. Aroma is trace malt (cereal), trace hops (herbs), with a light note of DMS. Flavor is lightly sweet, lightly bitter. Finish is lightly bitter. Light body, watery texture, fizzy carbonation. Yes, yes, it’s bad, but mainly because it’s so bland rather than smelling or tasting awful...there are other examples out there worse than this.
Radek Kliber (7165) - Toronto (Can) Krotoszyn (Pol), POLAND - DEC 22, 2001
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Dull , anoying aftertaste and aroma gives me unhappy toughts . Yet if you limit u self to 1 can you shall survive.
FROTHINGSLOSH (6837) - GREENSBURG, Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 21, 2009
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Sampled from a 16 oz can this beer poured a bright yellow color with a huge yellow-white head. The aroma was dryish, tangy industrial lager. The flavor was dryish and tangy with notes of cardboard. The finish was short and dry. Overcarbonated. Bland.
blutt59 (6511) - Dallas, Texas, USA - AUG 4, 2010
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20
can, golden yellow with strong head foam, aroma is sweaty, swarthy grain, flavor is more grainy corn and sweet
Beerman6686 (6379) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 21, 2008
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
this beer isnt ever really worthy of a description. Aroma is of cheap adjuncts. very pale yellow. Flavor is is rice and corn and metal.
HogTownHarry (6376) - Toronto (Harbourfront), Ontario, CANADA - SEP 4, 2005
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Can (473ml). "33% MORE than regular 355ml" - who can resist? Poured very pale flat-looking gold with a big fizzy white fast-sinking head. Smelled like corn, sweetener and ass. Tasted like sweetened composted ass malt. Watery: how did I like it? As if you had to ass ....
Cletus (6355) - Connecticut, USA - MAY 28, 2011
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Can carefully decanted into a beer glass while sitting on a nice deck overlooking the Long Island Sound on a nice sunny day as the speedboats and sailboats go by. Pours gold with a billowy white head that dissipates as the beer sits. Smells of apples, corn. some residual perfumy skunky dry notes. Tastes of apples and creamed corn with a light grainy finish. Quaffable for a cheap macro.
Rastacouere (6174) - Montreal, Quebec, CANADA - JUL 17, 2003
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Typical american standard, but shows a small bitterness towards the end which boosts it out of the bottom spot.