cyrenaica (440), Milton, Ontario, Canada
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Jul 7, 2007 There is not a lot to say about this beer that is good, not for me anyway. The beer is a very very light gold colour that is reminiscent of American lagers. There is no discernable smell to speak of nor is there any discernable taste. The mouthfeel is very watery with few hints of any carbonation. Overall this is not a beer that I would try again, nor is it a beer that I would recommend to others. This beer led to my worst beer experience ever. I was given this at a bar in Memphis Tennessee. It was clear enough that I could read the newspaper through the full glass. No aroma to speak of, and very little flavour. I asked the waitress what it was. She replied, It’s ’Milwaukee’s Best’. I replied that if that was Milwaukee’s best, I would hate to taste their worst. I was promptly asked to leave the bar. beermeasap (2), Washington, DC, Washington DC, USA does not count | 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 | Jul 7, 2007 True this is the kind of beer you would give to a friend who naturally was blind, tasteless, and also deaf (because you wouldn’t want him to keep asking, "This is premium beer....right?"). You can’t expect a beer to taste good or remotely good when you’re paying 10 buckets for a 30 pk. This is the type of beer you leave out for freshman while you & your friends drink the premium crap. jarlbartar (88), Janesville, Wisconsin, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Jul 6, 2007 ahh, the beast. many teenage years were spent running form the law, all buzzed out on the beast. nowadays, it’’s strictly for boiling brats in. a good cheap beer, if you are down on your luck, or have guests coming over that you don’t particularly care for. pojo41 (315), Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Jul 3, 2007 Known around here as"the beast." Lives up to it’s nickname. Godawful swill. Why do they persist in"brewing" this crap? Trappist (279), Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Jul 1, 2007 ARGHH!! It is the BEAST! Rotgut in pure liquid form. Not only is this not beer, it gives sewer water a bad name. Good to drink if nausea and headaches are your end goal. Glazed9884 (207), USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Jun 30, 2007 xxx bEAST!!!!!!! DONT DRINK!!!!! slimchill (776), Austin, Texas, USA
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 | Jun 30, 2007 Can. Has all the qualities one would expect from water, and it gets you drunk. bbp182 (255), Levittown, Pennsylvania, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Jun 26, 2007 Had it at a college party on tap, what would you expect from a college party? Cheap, gross beer. Poured too much foam, yellow in color, no hop taste. Not anything.
|