vitamine (35), USA
Sep 8, 2006 yeah if this is their best. i really do not want to see what else they have... this is horrible
 jason (1620), Easton, Pennsylvania, USA
Aug 31, 2006 Can. Why did i try this? why is this considered a beer? why am i rating this?
adamnfineman (53), Springfield, Oregon, USA
Aug 24, 2006 Wow...this is a bad beer. I mean bad. If this is the cheapest thing, buy something else, even if you have to ask people for spare change.
JohnnyJ (1283), Carlsbad, California, USA
Aug 19, 2006 Milwaukees Best? If thats true then Milwaukee must be in hell. This stuff is nasty... buy only as the last option.
sisyphus12 (98), Belmont, Massachusetts, USA
Aug 8, 2006 If there is truth to the label’s statement, I will not be visiting Wisconsin anytime soon. This stuff pours anemically into a 12oz glass. Some type of odd synthetic (metal?) aftertaste greets your mouth when you part with this beer.
jgentgesdo (564), Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
Aug 4, 2006 Can’t believe I haven’t rated this... this is the only beer on hand at my Father’s house. Pours a rather unpleasant yellow with bubbly white head and faint corn aroma. Flavor is of sour corn or maybe soured milk. Thin and watery, metallic aftertaste. Not all pale lagers are dreadful, but this of course is.
Sputerbug (112), Nacogdoches, Texas, USA
Jul 25, 2006 12 0z can. Pours like a cheap beer ,looks like a cheap beer ,smells like a very cheap beer,but tastes worse than a cheap beer.This brew is the worst I have ever tried.
jordanartuso (26), lansing, Michigan, USA
Jul 22, 2006 i’ve tried drinking this but after 3 sips my gag reflex started to kick in. don’t waste your time or money of this "beer."
|
View Statistics
