1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20 jpm30 (1587) - East Central, Georgia, USA - JUL 25, 2007
From a 12 oz. can, coded freshness date on the bottom, sampled in a pint glass.
Clear pale yellowish golden appearance with a frothy white head, slowly dissipates into a thin sudsy lacing.
A nose of adjuncts, corn and cereal dominate, a whiff of sulfur from the yeast.
Good carbonation and light bodied, corn and cereal grains backed up by thin sugary pale malts, a slight hop bitterness, dry cereal grainy finish, this is a tad too sweet for me and the sweetest and the basic lack of taste reduces the drinkability. I also think this is a bit rough in palate, I found it hard sip or gulp down.
I actually prefer the Light and Ice versions to the regular Milwaukee’s Best, all are cheap below average macro lagers.
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20 Jmichael (640) - Asheville, North Carolina, USA - JUL 25, 2007
the beast, drank in college b/c it was fun to drink, maybe, i don’t really know, what was I talking about.....
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20 biggmike (480) - Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA - JUL 15, 2007
Known universally as "The Beast". Little taste, low alcohol content, lots of carbonation. Target market: Drunks with little discretionary income.
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20 drinkbeer (281) - Redondo Beach, California, USA - JUL 14, 2007
The beast. It’s passable. But if you’re gonna go for crap, go for the beast ice. Same crappy taste but higher alc. Cause, really, isn’t that what you want?
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20 thenick (766) - North Bellmore, New York, USA - JUL 9, 2007
Wow, it tastes like watered-down light beer. That’s just....I didn’t think it was possible. I’ve had this once in my life and I have to say I never want to repeat the experience. Ever. Ever. Ever.
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20 BigBlue (7) - USA - JUL 8, 2007 does not count
Pure crap beer. If you’re going to drink crap beer at a party, at least get one that taste more watered down. Because in this case, it’s better to be watered down than to taste awful.
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20 cyrenaica (745) - Milton, Ontario, CANADA - JUL 7, 2007
There is not a lot to say about this beer that is good, not for me anyway. The beer is a very very light gold colour that is reminiscent of American lagers. There is no discernable smell to speak of nor is there any discernable taste. The mouthfeel is very watery with few hints of any carbonation. Overall this is not a beer that I would try again, nor is it a beer that I would recommend to others. This beer led to my worst beer experience ever. I was given this at a bar in Memphis Tennessee. It was clear enough that I could read the newspaper through the full glass. No aroma to speak of, and very little flavour. I asked the waitress what it was. She replied, It’s ’Milwaukee’s Best’. I replied that if that was Milwaukee’s best, I would hate to taste their worst. I was promptly asked to leave the bar.
1.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20 beermeasap (2) - Washington, DC, Washington DC, USA - JUL 7, 2007 does not count
True this is the kind of beer you would give to a friend who naturally was blind, tasteless, and also deaf (because you wouldn’t want him to keep asking, "This is premium beer....right?"). You can’t expect a beer to taste good or remotely good when you’re paying 10 buckets for a 30 pk. This is the type of beer you leave out for freshman while you & your friends drink the premium crap.
|