SamGamgee (1422), Santa Cruz (La Selva), California, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 6/20 | Jun 19, 2009 12oz can thanks to a very generous Theo. A very classy beer for a very classy leaving SB party! Clear straw yellow with a thin white head. The aroma is like some wet grain and paper. Not really bad, but not what you want in a beer. The flavor is lightly sweet with almost no bitterness and a grainy aftertaste. Watery and light overall, with ample carbonation. I can’t believe it’s taken me this long to try this beer, and lucked into it on one of my last nights at college before I move home, to probably never see it again. Very light, but with some malt flavors that are not all that bad. The more i get into beer, the more I appreciate the flavors in these light lagers. They serve a purpose, and this isn’t any worse than the bigger names in the genre, though it still reeks of mass production and minimal flavor impact. Indutiomarus (11), Kuwait
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Jun 16, 2009 I just don’t know what to say about this. Its just bad. Its not even really beer. Water with beer flavor added. ronaldtheriot (60), Laplace, Louisiana, USA
| 4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 4/5 | 8/10 | 4/5 | 17/20 | Jun 15, 2009 This is a very good beer, regardless of what others say. I’ve always liked Milwaukee’s Best. It’s got a good bite, and it goes well with just about any type of beer-oriented food. Why people have such animosity toward this product baffles me. Yes, it’s inexpensive, relative to other beers, but it’s good. It’s better, really, than other high-priced Miller beers. It is, unfortunately, only found in cans in Louisiana. I always enjoy a glass of this beer. One of the best for volume drinkers.
RJT bobbypaulson (100), , Minnesota, USA
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Jun 10, 2009 Another beer that when on sale was bought for fraternity parties. This beer has a very bitter taste but hey it’s cheap and gets the job done for a college kid. But for the beer greek in me it hurts to drink. Its a beast. UriahHeep (103), Georgia, USA
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 | Jun 9, 2009 Nothing to brag about. I was slummin’ it with a couple cans of this last night. Skunky malt and unremarkable hops. You get what you pay for, and this is just a sub-par beer made from sub-par ingredients, plain and simple. CUJO (339), Brooklyn, New York, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Jun 8, 2009 Very bad... 1 of 3 choices at a bbq... yes the other choices were equally bad and will be rated equally. stubby (326), Santee, California, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 | Jun 6, 2009 Prior raters are entitled to their own opinions. This beer, however, is a very drinkable beer and a standout example of the style. It is not offensive in any way except for lacking in character, but that’s the way it is supposed to be: a thirst quencher. There simply isn’t enough flavor to be offensive. A classic example of pale lager. ECrunner (1), Alabama, USA does not count | 5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 10/10 | 5/5 | 10/10 | 5/5 | 20/20 | Jun 2, 2009 Milwaukee’s Best gives you the best bang for your buck. It’s cheap and delicious and has been known to put hair on your testicles.
|