reebtogi (77), Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Jun 10, 2006 What the commercial description says, except for the premium taste part. I would not recommend this beer.
 Saarlander (1577), Saarlouis, Germany
Jun 9, 2006 I’ve had much worse, but this ranks down at the bottom, a terrible beer I’ve bought only when I’m broke, and am jones’in for an alcohol delivery. Not reccomended!
Beerdedone (1873), Croydon, Pennsylvania, USA
May 30, 2006 Can. Pours pale yellow with a sloppy white head. Aroma of corn water. Flavor is corn-like, grainy, and way watered down. Thin body, i am no fan of the beast.
patrick767 (2016), fort wayne, Indiana, USA
May 29, 2006 can - This is one disgusting pale lager. It’s like numerous other macro pale lagers, only worse. It is fit for one thing though. Slug food! If you have problems with slugs in your garden, put some Beast in a small container like a butter tub and put in the ground in the garden. The slugs are drawn to the beer, fall in, and die. Since this beer is about the cheapest around, it’s perfect. The slugs don’t have very refined palates. You see, Milwaukee’s Best does have a purpose!
Spam83 (2), USA
does not count  May 28, 2006 I’m pretty sure Milwaukee is selling themselves short. The beer tastes flat and acidic with an absolutely vile aftertaste. A few minutes after downing a few of these badboys you’ll find yourself running to the bathroom, Miller would do better bottling urine.
ZOSEPH (10), jefferson city, Missouri, USA
May 24, 2006 This is vicious filth. Smells like an old brass water fountain, Tastes like the same with a teeny amount of acid added. Flat and disgusting.
morrdt (608), Jacksonville, Florida, USA
May 22, 2006 There was one phrase that came to mind when I tried this beer: "God, that’s nasty." Cheap. Fu**ing. Beer.
Handy335 (5), Porterville, California, USA
does not count May 2, 2006 This stuff isn’t "beer". It’s horse whiz. My first 6 pack was my last six pack. A word to the wise: drink horse whiz instead..
|
View Statistics
