 euserphriendly (163), Holland, Pennsylvania, USA
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 |
Feb 7, 2005 Actually a little better than the light. of course that’s like saying, well I’d rather die of a gunshot than a knifewound because it is quicker.
Eructoblaster (1480), Gatineau, Quebec, Canada
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Feb 1, 2005 Bottle - 341ml. Boring pale gold and highly carbonated body topped with an instant-fading bubbly head. Weak aroma of corn and CO2. Poisonous taste made of a mix of chemical, soapy and corny flavors. Even desperately in need of beer, I would refuse to have that crap. Pretending that this is the best from Milwaukee is a shame for that city.
Lumpy (1802), Carrollton, Texas, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 |
Jan 18, 2005 Can. Macro. What more can be said? As far as macros go, it ain’t the worst, but it a’int the best.
changxao (104), South Carolina, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 |
Jan 17, 2005 Wow, this is probably the best of the three "milwaukee’s best" line, but that ain’t sayin’ much at all. Much corn and other adjuncts; on the plus side it is very cheap.
pjk33 (384), Sligo - Curllsville Heights, Pennsylvania, USA
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 |
Jan 11, 2005 Can. Even worse than the Beast light because you can actually taste the shitty corn and adjuncts without all the water that they add to the light version. Creamy without any body. You know that’s a problem. It was the beer that we drank in college when no one had any money. I quickly found money somewhere if I had to drink this swill. Light, metallic, corn, crap, no head, no good.
RockYerFaceOff (32), St. Charles, Missouri, USA
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Jan 7, 2005 If this is Milwaukee’s Best, remind me to avoid Milwaukee. It’s nickname is "Milwaukee’s Beast". To be honest, calling it beast doesn’t do it justice. "Beast", when related to this drink, is almost a term of endearment.
All smarmy quips aside, we know this beer is terrible. It has the same appeal of a McDonald’s hamburger - not very good, but it gets the job done when you’re desperate.
LilKem (1210), Marietta, Ohio, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 |
Jan 3, 2005 Beast is for playing beer pong or flip-cup. Otherwise, its weak, thin, cheap, and kinda skunky tasting. although i will say beast is better than beast light. ugh.
nick76 (2646), Tampa, Florida, USA
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 |
Jan 3, 2005 Updated: Jan 26, 2007This beer is an embarrassment to Milwaukee. You, I, and Milwaukee can do better than this. On the plus side it is cheap and that’s all most people who buy this beer are looking for. Weak and metallic with a sweet sour smell. A true last resort beer.
|
Rate This
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)