Shagnasty (130), Rochester, New York, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 | Oct 4, 2003 Putrid. Corn smell and taste, awful. Easily one of the worst beers I've had. What a terrible beer drinking weekend this has been, besides my exquisite homebrew. I don't think I need to describe this fitlh yet again. BigSkyman007 (194), USA
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 | Oct 2, 2003 Very watery, typical american pilsener tasting beer, but worse...there is a reason this beer is as cheap as it is... celogan (190), Oroville, California, USA
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | Sep 10, 2003 Well, Here I am at one of the lowest of the low budget beers. (yep still unemployed) SO "I says to myself" You've got to buy something cheap, Do I go with 18 bottles of MGD for 10.50 or 24 cans of this stuff for 9.99. Well price won out.
This is not terrible beer. Not what you'd call good, but drinkable. Poured very light yellow with a quickly dissappearing head. No lacing, not much aroma either. Flavor was similar to a weak flavored MGD. It did have the redeeming quality of good carbonation. If you're really broke or on unemployement like me, go ahead and grab a 24 back for about 10 bucks.
It's better than some of the crap out there.
Of course, by palate bing ruined lately by cheap beer, dut to obvious reasons, so take this into consideration. If I drank this on top of a good run of drinking good beer, the rating might be worse. Frank (1066), Chicago, Illinois, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 | Sep 7, 2003 A nice, easy-drinking American lager. Smooth carbonation and a bit sweeter than average for the style. Milwaukee's Best is no masterpiece but I don't get why it gets so hammered by other raters. It's prejudice against the style rather than actual thoughtful tasting, in my opinion. Sham (1846), Seattle, Washington, USA
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Sep 5, 2003 My grandfather used to drink this. I remember he gave me one when I was like 7 or 8. I didn't like it then, and when I tried it in high school, I still didn't like it. Had some recently at a party, and yep, still don't like it. evilpsych (34), USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Sep 2, 2003 In terms of Macro Beer, (and I mean BIG macro beer) this is the only Macro Beer I would drink in any real quantity, simply due to its lightness and cheapness. This is what I would call a beer to drink whilst running power tools or perhaps welding equipment. first's ones always a bit spunky, but the second, 3rd, and 20th go down relatively smooth with a sweetish aftertaste. kumite56 (461), Cordova, Tennessee, USA
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 | Aug 27, 2003 Warning. Not to be consumed by people with IQ's greater than their shoe size. The surgeon general has also determined that drinking this beer is hazardous to your health. Bouts of gagging and intestial distress are common and in much greater quanties than an equal placebo. Mental health is to be suspect on anyone caught drinking this swill. This is the Saddam Hussein of beer. Just plain bad. garrison (455), Cin. city, Ohio, USA
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/20 | Aug 17, 2003 The vox populi is right... this stuff is beastly, absolutely beastly! Pale, skunky, and nigh flavorless, I hate this (so called) beer.
|