omhper (12172), Stockholm, Sweden
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 5/20 | Dec 5, 2002 Canned. Pale yellow with quick airy head. Faint grainy aroma. Not much flavour, exceplt a hint of lightly salted boilde vegetables. Very light bodied, no bitterness. No masterpiece... Rastacouere (5552), Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 | Jul 17, 2003 Typical american standard, but shows a small bitterness towards the end which boosts it out of the bottom spot. hopscotch (5466), Vero Beach, Florida, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Aug 2, 2002 Three words...bitter tonic water jcwattsrugger (5223), Florida and, New Jersey, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 7/20 | May 10, 2005 OK, I’ve seen and heard and read plenty about the beast line of beers. I didn’t care for the smell but the taste for a pale beer was nondescript, not awful, similar to it’s Ice version. mj (4992), Colorado, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/20 | Aug 28, 2004 my buddy went and bought this. seriously. see, in oklahoma the liquor stores close at 9pm, and they carry all of the beer over 3.2% ABW... so, on an excursion to a 7-11 store, he picks this stuff up... I didn’t know he would get shitty beer when we went. anyway, I was out of my stuff that I brought over, so I had a can of this gem. Started by just drinking it out of the can. At this point, it wasn’t that bad... foamy, fizzy, light grainy flavor and aroma... still, not too offensive. But, I got greedy and wanted to see it’s appearance for the rating, so I threw the rest of the can into my glass. holy hell shit on fire... the nose turns from unnoticable to a burning fuel and corn conflagration... erupting into my nose like a chemical bath of putrid, rotting, burning corn. the flavor changed completely now that I was actually letting the vapor into my nose. So, this is what we have: not too bad out of the can (flavorless), horrible in a glass... you have to wonder how the brewers taste-test this stuff.... do they wait for it to be canned first to get the proper experience? Cornfield (4917), Oak Forest, Illinois, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Aug 30, 2004 I like Milwaukee. Good town, good people, good microbrews... They can do much, much better than this p-water. To call this watery, tasteless lager their best is an insult to those good folk. It tastes, at best, like the waste output of a chemical factory. JPDIPSO (4875), Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 | Dec 30, 2003 Can. Yellow straw color with a fisy bubbly white head. Damn these american standards make you work to find something. Dusty light malt aroma. Light brown sugar and slight mild grain flavor. BückDich (4823), McCall, Idaho, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 2/20 | Jan 9, 2003 The only things these crappy american standards have as pros is price and quenching on a hot day....just like water! Hey, I can drink water for free. Well, looks like I’ve just excluded the need for this beer in the world.
|