crossovert (5627) - Illinois, USA - MAR 4, 2011
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
Better than a macro but not saying much, as far a s a pilsener goes it is weak, maybe it is more just a pale lager.
mcjay (463) - Neenah, Wisconsin, USA - NOV 2, 2010
2.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Light golden color with a thin white head. Mild grainy and slightly sweet aroma. Flavors of wheat and hops with a somewhat dry finish.
bpreo (1312) - Eugene, Oregon, USA - OCT 27, 2010
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
I honestly like this one a little better than the Billy Bock. Good, smooth flavor.
arminjewell (5144) - Fort Collins, Colorado, USA - SEP 7, 2010
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Pours golden from bottle, aroma of corn, sweet biscuit. Taste is like a typical macro lager, but has a bit more flavor and is not offensive. Not a bad brew, but very one dimensional.
cbfobes (1935) - Madison, Wisconsin, USA - AUG 25, 2010
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Poured from bottle, pours a clear light golden color with little head at all, aroma is of sweet malt and corn, taste is very sweet that is one note and not all that great.
dekester1 (285) - Neenah, Wisconsin, USA - AUG 4, 2010
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Poured a sound gold with a nice head that faded to lace. Aroma of malt and corn w/ hint of hops. Taste was similar to a cream ale with a slightly stronger hop flavor but still relatively moderate at best. Mouth feel was decent. Overall, this tasted more like a cream than a pilsner in my book but it still was decent.
IlanMan (1015) - Appleton, Wisconsin, USA - MAY 5, 2010
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle. I was actually a little more impressed with this beer than the rest of the variety pack I purchased. The pour was light golden with a nice white head. Aroma was of a slight spicy hop, light citrus, corn, and crisp malt. Flavors were nice and smooth with mostly crisp malts finishing with just a touch of hop flavor and bitterness. I could have used a bit more hop dominance, but this wasn’t such a bad brew. Not a lot of flaws.
jhudson1977 (2) - USA - NOV 2, 2009 does not count
4.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 15/20
This beer has a floral aroma of a nice balanced hop base that includes a hint of malt. The appearance is golden, clear, and pours with a nice white foam. This beer comes with a medium bitterness and light sweetness. Refreshing for a pilsner. This beer also comes with a medium body, slick feel, average carbonation and is slightly bitter. Overall, I found this beer to be refreshing as a pilsner. I am not one to thoroughly enjoy a pilsner, but this one I would buy again. I believe it to be the body more so than anything else. Everything else was good for a pilsner but the body was slightly heavier than a normal pilsner.
patrick767 (3232) - fort wayne, Indiana, USA - NOV 1, 2009
1.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
bottle - Pours clear yellow-gold with a thin white head. It has a grainy malt aroma with some sugary and debatably fruity notes. The mild flavor is of sweet, grainy malt and barely there hops. It’s watery as hell. This sucks.
DuffMan (5776) - the land of bitumen, beef & beer, Alberta, CANADA - OCT 5, 2009
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Sampled at the first annual Medicine Hat Beer Festival. Pale straw yellow, very stinky corny aroma. Ridiculously sweet palate with underlying sulfurous grains. Very bad.