document (36) - USA - FEB 5, 2003
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Hey, it's better than Bud. Or is it? Not sure how you'd figure out, other than price, but that and whatever alcohol you'll find in this made it a trusty companion once upon a time. My rating is from the returnable bottle.
milwaukeebeer (41) - Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - JAN 5, 2012
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
I had a can of this "brew" back in the early nineties. Kind of tasted a little like Pabst imho. Cheap buzz.
muskiekillerz (5) - Somerset, New Jersey, USA - SEP 16, 2011 does not count
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Wasn’t the best beer in the world of course. Although for the price, you got a good deal. ($10/case bottles). Minimal unique taste and pretty run of the mill for lower tier brands.
dyetube (1153) - McKinney, Texas, USA - SEP 5, 2010
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
This beer is malty with a bread dough flavor, a watery mouthfeel and little to no hops. Drinking from can so cannot rate color well. This is not very good but it was refreshing I guess. Cheers!
JPDIPSO (4956) - Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, USA - MAR 3, 2004
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Light golden color with a light white head. Aromas of pale malt, mild DMS, and a touch of earthy hops. Flavors are grainy and lightly acidic. Need to include some history. Pigs Eye is the local name for where the wastewater treatment plant and sludge burning was located in St. Paul.
celogan (201) - Oroville, California, USA - AUG 9, 2003
2.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
For a cheap beer this isn't too bad. I had some at a beer tasting and spoke to one of the owners who informed me they changed the hops from the original recipe and made it a bit better than it was. It does have some flavor which is decent, but could be a tad stronger in flavor but still decent.
Poured medium yellow with some head that evaporated rather quickly but actually did have some lacing. Carbonation was decent as well. I wouldn't turn this down on a hot day as it could be a good thirst quencher. It's better than BMC or other ilk of that type.
Crit (3211) - Surrey, British Columbia, CANADA - DEC 16, 2002
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
nothing special. slightly more body than a main stream lager
Slick (1969) - Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA - NOV 30, 2002
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Definately nothing special ,or anything that stands out to make this anything better then a middle of the road pils
gsmitty80 (1736) - Washington DC, USA - OCT 28, 2002
2.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
I really liked this beer. Cant remember much of what it was like but i know i enjoyed it.
Kato239 (5) - Durango, Colorado, USA - OCT 2, 2002 does not count
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
This stuff us swill. After drinking the first one, the other five sat in our fridge until we could find someone drunk enough to finish them off. Instant headache.