SiddFinch (155) - Pen Argyl, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 20, 2003
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Doesn't look like mud (I can see through it). Doesn't taste like mud either (mud has more flavor). Nonetheless, there is some decent nut/coffee flavor that makes this very drinkable.
mrpeanut (17) - Latrobe, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 6, 2003
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
I love the bottle. a nice semi-heavy B and T. Drink it quick becasue when its warm it tastes like actual mud.
bob32256 (171) - Jacksonville, Florida, USA - OCT 24, 2003
2.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
nice malt aroma; dark brown, but with a watery look; the taste is also watery; not bad, but just not interesting
tsarman (794) - Northern, New Jersey, USA - OCT 22, 2003
3.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Big props for making the most wonderful bottle ever. It looks so back-woodsy. And a full pint too. Wonderful! The beer is very carbonaty at first, but smoothed out soon. Decent beer, decent for a store bought black and tan. Tastes very similar to the Yuengling Black and Tan.
Dorwart (2534) - Robbinsville, New Jersey, USA - OCT 22, 2003
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Hmmmm. Very neat but strange bottle with a screw cap. Deduction! Nice frothy head with great lacing. Small carbonation. Aroma of roasted malts and some nuts. Color is a very nice dark reddish brown. Flavor is a little weak with malts and a bit of chocolate. Finish is smooth but bland. An ok beer and not impressive.
y0cola (361) - fremont, California, USA - OCT 10, 2003
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Didn't really taste like a porter. I'm surprised to see this from NY. i was thinking wetlands. Probably why this beer sucks ass.
biomechanic (55) - Washington, USA - SEP 8, 2003
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Not a bad beer but is NOT a porter by any chance. It's kinda nutty and sligtly malty, not much alcohol flavor (read bland!). Better than some macrobrews
GreatStelle (363) - Chico, California, USA - SEP 8, 2003
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 9/20
It sucks that Mississippi mud is made in New York, what a rip off. With that aside it's not a bad beer. It's not good either. Very watery and lacks flavor for it's color. Buy it for the bottle.
grant (842) - Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA - AUG 28, 2003
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Okay, so the jug is cool. And it's not that expensive. Reddish-purple brown. Average lacing and retention. Too bright looking. Aroma is fair: very nutty with buttery malts and a little bit of cocoa. Flavor disappoints: synthetic-tasting smokiness, plasticy, just not a good blend, in very real terms. Palate and finish are beyond underwhelming. Could it be thinner than water?
brownaler (547) - Alexandria, Virginia, USA - AUG 27, 2003
2.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Dark brown appearence that you can barely see through. Only a trace of thickness can be found in this beer and it has an unimpressive finish.