Sturgess (173) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 1, 2002
3.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
I liked this beer quite a bit...it’s my favorite black and tan, and the bottle is very unique. I like the taste as it’s chocalatey with some nuttiness as well as having a good pilsnerish aftertaste.
Cartoonkhaki (1221) - Brantford, Ontario, CANADA - NOV 30, 2002
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Discofish (152) - USA - NOV 23, 2002
3.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
This stuff is cheap, and is really drinkable.
Slick (1969) - Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA - NOV 2, 2002
4.2 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
i dont know ithink its a damn good b&t but im sometimes i cant get better stuff so im a bit limited on this one. its the only one in town rite now but its pretty good kinda like granny clampet
austinpowers (2826) - New York, New York, USA - NOV 1, 2002
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 14/20
This nice jug/bottle could be dropped in the mud of a bayou swamp but the beer would be unharmed because of the protective crockware. Not sure that’s a good thing though, now that I’ve tasted the beer. Very thin and lagerish...with hints of sourness. Yuengling’s does the B&T better.
Gusler (2653) - Tucson, Arizona, USA - OCT 18, 2002
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Re-Rate 10/18/02: The beer pours a clear incandesant dark ruby color, the head is modest, beige, the lace wraithish. Nose is malt, light hits of caramel. Front is malt, a tad sweet, the top thin, the finish is shilpit, minimal carbonation, nebishly hopped. Drinkable, and the bottle is ’Cute’, and I always find a ’Lady’ that wants the empties, a pleasure in its own right. Does not rank on my current 1000 beer master list.
labattblueleaf (225) - Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - OCT 6, 2002
3.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
Cool bottle. Sweet taste. Almost like a chocolate carmel flavor. Much thinner and lighter than I expected. I didn’t find it to be bitter as the description states. Less black than tan.
presario (4729) - Stampede City, Alberta, CANADA - SEP 23, 2002
3.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
UPDATED: JUL 3, 2006 Good foamy head. Dark amber colour. Decent aroma. Thinner than I expected. Sweeter too, almost like a cooler. Great bottle but now that I have an MT I’ll continue my search for the perfect beer elsewhere. The more I drank of the bottle the more the sweetness got in the way. Had a similar flavoured home brew (Pale Ale) the next day that was much better (dry without the sweetness).
mrkimchee (1414) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - SEP 9, 2002
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
more tan than black. lots of carbo, othewise, not a whole lot of anything in this beer. at least the bottle looks cool.
scottyg (79) - Gainesville, Florida, USA - AUG 27, 2002
2.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Not as bad as I thought it was going to be. But still nothing amazing. Definitely a cool jug if that sells you beer.