RSRIZZO (1900) - Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA - OCT 11, 2007
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Had this beer on 10/2/2002. Aroma is mild malt scent. Color was an orange/amber with ok carbonation and head. Taste is mild with a nice hoppyness. Overall I think its a good beer.
JohnC (3004) - Mission Viejo, California, USA - MAY 12, 2003
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Golden w/ a small head. Slightly malty aroma. Crisp tasting w/ some citric hoppiness.
JCW (1277) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - MAY 24, 2003
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Yellowish, color. Some malt aroma. Mine was a little runny and could have used more hops
billk (353) - Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, USA - DEC 27, 2003
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: OCT 29, 2004 Bottle 12 oz. This stuff was good 2 1/2 years ago. Full bodied, malty, hoppy, viscous, very cloudy with a pleasant toasted flavor. Then it changed abruptly to a mainstream, commercial, diluted, crystal clear, sterile bore. I remember buying up a load of the older brew when the replacement came on the market.
bbooth (115) - Gilbert, Arizona, USA - JUL 16, 2002
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 8/20
A buddy of mine gave me a bottle of this, and I think it may have gone bad, because there was slight ’funky’ smell to it that also came out in the finish. The same smell and taste was in the Amber as well. I think I will try this again later and re-rate, but until then this beer was aweful.