superdude1979 (62) - Phoenix, Arizona, USA - DEC 2, 2007
2.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Not a horrible beer, better as draft than in the bottle. Canada is flooded with beers like this that people buy just because they have been drinking it forever. When it’s cold it is okay, when it is warm it is very watery.
AWS9 (623) - Mississauga, Ontario, CANADA - OCT 24, 2007
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
UPDATED: APR 5, 2008 Re-rate.
Had this in a bottle, which was slightly better than it was in a can, so I felt it deserved a slight upgrade from before. Still terrible beer. Watery, burnt corn taste. Doesn’t have a "refreshing" Caribbean taste, so I’m not sure what makes this bohemian... ugh.
matt7215 (2278) - Cambridge, Ontario, CANADA - SEP 17, 2007
2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
UPDATED: AUG 3, 2010 341 bottle. standard pale lager with slightly more to offer then most buck a beers. id never turn one down so long as its free/////////////////re-rate 030810 clear gold with white head and lace. crappy green apple nose. decent real malt flavour and actual hop balance lingering on a touch of bitterness. finishable.
Rcr84 (33) - CANADA - AUG 4, 2007
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Tried this and carling in the same night.... i really think they are the exact same beer. Watery corn flavor very boring. Much rather spend more for a enjoyable beer.
chainman (104) - Ontario, CANADA - JUL 24, 2007
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
I bought this out of curiosity...for the same money, you can get the monstrosity that is Lakeport, you can get the watery charm of Lucky, or you can get Bohemian (as well as about 20 other brands in this category). For its price, this is the best I’ve had - reminds me of a watery OV or Golden...has that Molson characteristic malt taste, and is surprisingly easy to drink! This was a good "band practice" beer...I wouldn’t buy this to just sit around and enjoy, but if you need a bunch of beer while you’re doing something else, this one is perfect. Bonus points for the price! [side note: I have heard two versions of what this beer is: 1) Bottom-of-the-barrell Canadian/OV/whatever mixed together and watered-down, or 2) Made from the same recipe as Canadian, but with way cheaper ingredients. ] Either way, I would take this over Canadian!
markas101 (2270) - Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA - JUL 19, 2007
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
33 cl bottle, Shelburne. Sweet corn aroma, same in the taste. Not terrible, better than other offerings for the ’24 for 24’ category, but I’d still spend a few dollars more for a much better beer. The 5 out 5 review - really?
vondutch (5) - Alberta, CANADA - JUN 18, 2007 does not count
5 AROMA 10/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 20/20
This is a damn fine beer for $27.00 / case of 24. In Ontario anyway. Sadly I can’t find any Bohemian OR Pabst in Calgary... :( Anyone seen any around?
JohnBarleycorn (537) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - JUN 10, 2007
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Bottle. Medium-gold, tonnes of large bubbles and a consistent foamy head. Aroma profile is a weird mix of grain, alcohol, urine and iceberg lettuce. Unexciting palate. Excruciatingly basic flavour is little more than watery grain. The bland flavour even ruined a good plate of fries. Not worth the bottle label, let alone a buck and change.
stcuddy (4) - king st, Ontario, CANADA - MAR 8, 2007 does not count
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Decent beer for very cheap. Doesnt break the bank and can be enjoyed on a day to day basis.
wilderthanyou (758) - Guelph, CANADA - FEB 28, 2007
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
As far as cheap beers go, this is certainly one of the better ones. Its a good beer to take fishin with you. Not really much to say about the appearnce or taste that hasn’t already been said.