JAF737300 (1291) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - JAN 23, 2007
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
I had a can of this from a friend and for an everyday later in the night beer it is not bad. You could do better but not too bad!
thepegjett (1260) - Cambridge (via Winnipeg), Cambridgeshire, ENGLAND - JAN 25, 2011
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
A - Little to no nose
A - Light yellow
T - Sugary sweetness throughout
P - Watery
O - Canít believe the old man used to drink this
Cartoonkhaki (1246) - Brantford, Ontario, CANADA - NOV 30, 2002
1.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
If someone moved to Windsor and itís the only beer on tap at the dive bar across the street it wont seem so bad.
JesseM (1158) - Margaritaville, Ontario, CANADA - APR 23, 2008
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
UPDATED: APR 28, 2008 Bottled at the Spur in Waterloo. This beer was neither old, nor a Vienna. Okay okay that was a lame joke! The most tiny and insignificant trace of caramalt sets this apart from other crappy beers at bars. Meh, I didnít have to pay for it, which is always a good thing for the over-all impression score!
HeistAlmighty (1156) - Saint John, New Brunswick, CANADA - OCT 27, 2014
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
Can. Actually not too bad tasting. Bready, sweet and I could find some hops surprisingly. Body was super thin and wet, though and not at all enjoyable. Overall, better than it should be.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
TipsyMcStager (1139) - Calgary, Alberta, CANADA - MAR 28, 2003
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
foul odour, skunky with a mild graininess. Macro appearance - 'nuff said. Mildly refreshing, not a real standout, but not as bad as its reputation.
frylock (1135) - Atlanta, Georgia, USA - DEC 17, 2003
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
Pretty shitty as one would expect. alot of corn in the aroma and flavor, a bit of a rotten apple flavor too. Good for causing intoxication and a hangover, thats about it though.
cyrenaica (1126) - Milton, Ontario, CANADA - JUL 7, 2007
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
My goal is to rate all the beer Iíve tried. That means rating the bad ones along with the good ones. This is one of the bad ones. Where I went to University, this beer had the raunchy nickname of "íOl Vag___", but I was not informed of that until after trying it.
This is one of the old Carling OíKeefe products (Carling OíKeefeís Olí Vienna Lager) that was popular in the late 70s and early 80s complete with television commercials. It pours a weak yellow colour with little head. The aroma was very skunky (every time I have tried this). The taste is rather skunky as well, not a friend to the mouth at all. Strong carbonation, and very little discernable maltiness. The more I thought about it, the less I liked it. After a couple, I was able to safely declare it among the worst Canadian beer I had ever tasted.
Crockett (1076) - Southampton,Ontario, Ontario, CANADA - JUL 24, 2004
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 9/20
Draft pour. Clear and light gold with a tiny sudsy soap head. Aroma is mildly hop, grassy floral and grainy Crisp and clean, not much flavour. Lots of carbonation. Light toast and malt. Dull dry finish.
AskForJenny (1064) - Ontario, New York, USA - MAR 28, 2016
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
Suitcase Of Cans - Basic budget brew, tastes better than most in that age bracket