arventresca (564) - Charlotte, North Carolina, USA - MAR 25, 2009
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
This has to be the best beer you can get for a $6.00 12-pack. Not offensive in anyway and quite pleasurable to drink. OV, you are a pour mans dream.
howie (549) - DeForest, Wisconsin, USA - SEP 23, 2002
1.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
UPDATED: MAR 29, 2005 My favorite of the ’Canadian Standards’, which isn’t saying much. Very drinkable, happy little beer.
beanmedic (347) - Hamilton, Ontario, CANADA - JUL 22, 2005
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
I had a bottle of this after having a bottle of Molson Export. After drinking the export, I noticed that OV has absolutely no taste. And Export is pretty crappy. I hate rating macro crap.
bipolar1 (268) - Hancock, Michigan, USA - SEP 30, 2001
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
I’ll take a Canadian macro-lager over an American one anyday.
iambeer (255) - Ontario, CANADA - MAR 3, 2005
2.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
A smooth acompaniment to a Bali dish, quite good. To agree with leedsfan, it seemed to be more popular in the ol’days. Not bad still.
dankfor20 (193) - Las Vegas, Nevada, USA - JUN 18, 2002
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Not the worst lager i’ve had definately drinkable but i don’t see why’d i want to if there is good beer around
LuckeyHaskins99 (180) - Toledo, Ohio, USA - FEB 7, 2002
2.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Okay OV is pretty simple stuff. smoother than Budwesier, kind of crisp, not too much. The least pretentious of the Molson line. It doesn’t try to be what it isn’t and it good at that. They used to sponsor five pin bowling, and is currently about as common.
emobassfoo (178) - Webster, New York, USA - SEP 18, 2007
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Rated while drinking: Pours the color of yellow corn with an unattractive diminishing white head. Actually has a teensy bit of hops in the aroma. Weird bottle smell though. Tastes pretty mainstream, but surprisingly nothing too "off". Probably because there’s actually hops present in the sea of bad malt and adjuncts. Nothing going on in the palate; carbonated water feel. But drinkable. Had no idea what this was, but picked up a 12 pack at Wegmans for 6 dollars. It’s pretty refreshing to watch a ball game and tip these back. Don’t think I’d be a repeat buyer though.
sleepdirt (169) - Winnipeg, Manitoba, CANADA - OCT 7, 2001
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
A beer of my youth. I remember It tasted ok when O’keefe made it. Ever Since Molson bought them out this beer just tastes bad.
Northernbrewer (147) - St. Paul, Minnesota, USA - AUG 18, 2002
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
As I walked up to the "Inn" it looked abandoned, and down a couple of broken down hallways I found an old man selling beer and this is what he had, so I purchased some and headed back to the lake. The surprise? It is actually not bad. Well made with a pleasing lager sweetness and no creamed corn flavor so typical of the style.