2.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20 troyc (2014) - Oklahoma, USA - AUG 8, 2006
(0.33L Bottle) Pours yellow with little head. Sweet malty tasting... no bitterness. A little unbalanced, but not too bad.
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20 crzybob77 (529) - Richmond, Virginia, USA - AUG 6, 2006
While there certainly is no doubt this is a cheap taste lacking beer, but this is much more preferable over most US macro BMC stuff.
2.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20 celogan (195) - Oroville, California, USA - AUG 5, 2006
Not TOO bad for a Canadian Lager. Poured lkight straw yellow. Minimal head and no lacing at all. Very little aroma but decent carbonatino. Lilght body and mouth feel. Taste was non-offensive, but refreshing. Slight sweetnes with a very slight hop finish. This is definetely Not a go out and get beer but it IS worh grabbing a sixer if it’s on sale and you get it along with your favorite brew; and not instead of it
Good on a hot day but it must be ICE COLD. I actually liked the taste better straight from the bottle after sitting in ice for several hours. I won’t go out and get it agin anytime soon, but I won’t turn it down if given by a host/hostess either.
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20 CanadaCam (109) - CANADA - AUG 2, 2006
Moosepiss has got to be Canada’s most overrated lager. This stuff is crap. The head disappears quickly, it’s thin, has a metalic taste. Not my cup of tea, or pint of beer as the case me be. If you’re going to drink a Canadian macrobrewed lager, you’re best choice is still Canada’s classic: Molson Canadian.
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20 Phatz (225) - Paradise, Pennsylvania, USA - AUG 1, 2006
Appearance: Pours a pale straw yellow color with a bleach white head. There is lots of active carbonation rising from the bottom.
Smell: Grain and sweet malt aromas are apropos for the style. Impressive, maybe not but sweet and pleasant, certainly.
Taste: This is an average macro. It is far better than BMC to me and as an All Malt lager it holds its own though many micros are superior, this one is damn cheep. For the price you could buy PBR or Moosehead Lager.
It has a sweet grain and malty barley flavor that that ends with hop bitter, dry finish but little flavor from the hop flower. There is just enough sweet and dry balanced flavor to make it somewhat interesting.
Mouthfeel: Smooth typical malty body that is light in weight and crisp around the edges.
Drinkability: Okay, so I thought I was going to hate this beer but it turns out I surprised to find a bit of flavor. Still, this is a session beer to choose when you are aiming for quantity per $ not quality. In other words it is a suitable choice for a party beer.
Hope this is helpful.
Cheers!
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20 dkoonce (905) - People’s Republic of Athens, Ohio, USA - JUL 31, 2006
Clear gold, with a good thick head. Mostly malt, with a smooth medium body that was better than I remembered.
2.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20 Sputerbug (113) - Nacogdoches, Texas, USA - JUL 25, 2006
12 oz bottle .pours a light golden with a white head.Aromas of sweet malt and hops are present.A sweet malty taste that is taken over slightly by the hops.A little off balanced but still when ice cold it gets the job done.
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20 Skinnyviking (5472) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - JUL 23, 2006
Draught. Short white head. Clear golden body. Weak hops aroma. Thin body with a relatively sweet flavor without much bitterness.
|