crazyjoeda (6), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada does not count Mar 18, 2005 Updated: Feb 3, 2006Disgusting! This excuse for a beer is under carbonated and very bland. I would never buy it again. can8ianben (903), Pasadena, California, USA Mar 18, 2005 Somehow these basic beers last forever. This is Canada’s oldest brewery, but this beer is basic. Not much going on. A good thirst quencher, but little else. carlitos99 (184), The Big Apple, USA Mar 16, 2005 Nothing at all special about this beer from the land of Bob & Doug McKenzie. Simple lager that goes from drinable to undrinkable as you drink it. Stick with the german stuff. stringtheory (4), woodinville, Washington, USA does not count Mar 15, 2005 on tap at the lucky seven. AWFUL! Definatly gives the american shittay’s a run for their money. dirtyc (173), Erie, Pennsylvania, USA Mar 13, 2005 A horrible beer, left a bitter taste, appearance wasn’t appealing whatsoever, but I had to try it at least once, just didn’t enjoy Moosehead SpecialSauce (47), Madison, Wisconsin, USA Mar 13, 2005 Pale golden color, moderate head. When chilled it’s a better refreshment than beer, per se. The flavors aren’t really distinctive at all, a very generic taste. Not necessarilly bad, but nothing spectacular. I guess I’d drink it if it was cheap and plentiful. SuIIy (1406), Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, USA Mar 7, 2005 The pale green bottle and high carbonation of this brew starts it off on a bad note. The beer itself doesnt improve upont that. little to no true taste, basically fizzy, bad tasting water highlandlad (1258), Sydney, Australia Mar 7, 2005 Forgettable Canadian macro lager. Pale gold colour, scant head. The aroma is the best thing about it: sweet citric hops, with pineapple and melon notes. Quenching palate. Oversweet and abrupt. (Bottle)
|