ELab2 (38), USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 4/10 | 1/5 | 5/20 | Apr 7, 2008 No aroma. Pissy bland flavor. Reminded me a lot of O’Douls non-alcoholic that my dad would give me when I was a kid. Terrible guyinchicago (526), marengo, Illinois, USA
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 2/5 | 3/20 | Apr 6, 2008 just another pale lager yellow white head ,very light blah, blah blah ,blah oh yeah what about the unique taste of skunk or is that moose musk Wulfstan (509), California, USA
| 3.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 15/20 | Apr 3, 2008 This is actually a pretty good basic lager that meets the role of such a beer quite well. It is gold with a big white head that steadily shrinks to a smaller, but permanent, head. The aroma is juniper with hints of grain and a faint sulphur/skinky quality, and it is faintly musty. The taste is a good, basic lager of grain, corn, a hints of juniper and flowers. It is pretty sweet with only a faint hint of bitterness to take the edge off the sweetness. It’s simple but quite enjoyable, very easy to drink, and has a pretty good, almost slightly oily, body for the type of beer. Ubermunch (23), Maryland, USA
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 9/20 | Apr 3, 2008 Canada may have socialized medicine, cheap prescriptions, and ’Corner Gas’, but they have a lot to explain on this one. Taste is funky all the way through with funky, in ths case, being like "old storage trunk" funky. Reach right past this one and find something else! furballman (25), Seoul, South Korea
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | Mar 30, 2008 I would have to say that this beer is a very smooth beer, maybe too smooth, and not enough taste to go with the smoothness. But that’s ok, if you like watery beers this is the beer for you. If not, then just try it once, but I doubt you’ll be a return buyer if you don’t like watery beers. In its defence it is alot better than alot of other watery beers that I know and I would prefer to drink it to budweiser, that’s for sure. KingpinIPA (842), Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 | Mar 29, 2008 Golden color. Smell of malt, hops, skunk and corn syrup. Taste pf pale malt, skunk and hops. Mirage52 (123), New Market, Maryland, USA
| 3.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 4/5 | 16/20 | Mar 28, 2008 Pours from the bottle the standard pale lager yellow color but with a big head. Also some nice coating as I drink it. The taste is smooth, clean and crisp. Tastes very fresh. Not getting much from the finish... no hops or skunk from the green bottle, but it is a refreshing beer to drink on a hot day. Plus it’s from the great country of Canada, and for that I probably will rank it higher than it deserves. kidmartinek (975), austin, Texas, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 | Mar 28, 2008 Corn, corn syrupy taste. Gross. Pours with a mees of foam. Tastes like corn with pee smell. Pale clear yellow, just like all crappy lagers. Why would anyone waste the time brewing this.
|