2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20 teknotronik (11) - York, Pennsylvania, USA - OCT 15, 2007
Light tasting lager, goldish-clear head that settles quickly, when chilled tastes refreshing. This beer was popular back in the day. I’ve found my self picking this beer up a few times. It had a hint of a olive taste to it that was semi-bitter.
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20 badnewsbeers (2297) - Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - OCT 10, 2007
draft at a local bar...nothing to explain here other than the fact its better than some macro...............
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20 BelgianBeerGal (2224) - Dayton Area, Ohio, USA - SEP 26, 2007
Draft watching rugby in Canada. It was nice and refreshing. Better than most mass produced pale lagers, but certainly nothing special.
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20 drfabulous (2288) - Lexington, Kentucky, USA - SEP 25, 2007
The beer of my teens. For some reason, I loved this beer. Maybe because it offered the idea of something different. Maybe I tasted the beers I would eventually taste. Maybe it was just the realization that there are better beers than Bud or Bud Lite. This is not a good beer. Except in my memory.
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20 Jan Primus (160) - Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA - SEP 16, 2007
Not too sure how to review a lager as they all are pretty similar. This one has less of a urine flavour than most, and a bit sweeter too. A beer I prefer from the bottle.
1.7 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20 Taverner (1036) - San Ramon, California, USA - SEP 15, 2007
I used to love this stuff as a teenager, but today it tastes like sweetened club soda. Not much flavor - pale yellow no matter how thick. Not much head, goes down better in the bottle than in a glass.
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20 jbuzz (700) - Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - SEP 13, 2007
I don’t care what anyone says Moosehead is good. Canada has Rush and Moosehead !! Nice clear yellow beer with a thin lingering head. Slightly sweet and very easy to drink.
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20 phllybeer29 (20) - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA - SEP 12, 2007
Draught beer, not bad, drinkable. As a rater mentioned previously, a very easily drinking beer cause of it’s flat taste and texture.
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20 Ughsmash (5837) - Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA - SEP 11, 2007
Bottled. Poured clear bright golden with a dusting and a light ring of white head. The aroma was of skunk-infused pale malts with an herbal/medicinal twist to it... not good. The flavor was definitely better.. the skunk was subdued leading to a sweet pale and bready malt backing paired with mild herbal bitterness and the faintest pinch of lemon zest.. slight warmth and the back of the mouth bring out some corny adjuncts. Light-bodied on the palate with very mild bitterness.. gets caught up a bit in the middle and some medicinal notes on the finish hurt the drinkability. I like the logo.
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20 awwshiz (76) - USA - SEP 2, 2007
Pale lager, nothing great. Its only virtue is the ease of which this beer can be drunk.
|