 ukoolaid (572), Amherst, Massachusetts, USA
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 |
Nov 1, 2005 Keg! Light and fizzy. Mildly sweet. Sure it was crap, but man was I drunk. My buddy that got the keg said it was pretty cheap.
kheffelf (5), Mishawaka, Indiana, USA
does not count  | 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Oct 31, 2005 This was one of the worst beers that I have ever had, a friend brought them over and drank about the first half trying to get myself to like it, this beer isn’t even worth trying
ehhdayton (1113), USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 |
Oct 25, 2005 Moosehead has little aroma. The color is a light golden with a small rapidly diminishing white head. There is little taste except for some slight bitterness and not much aftertaste.
Fish (439), Kure, Japan
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Oct 24, 2005 Updated: Jan 18, 2006Rerated 1-19-06. Paying a bit closer attention this time. It’s still a pale lager, but the aroma was pleasantly fruity nothing skunky about this beer in the least. Palate was decent. Not much in the way of hops :( //Hmm... Paler lager equals crap. End of story. Nothing against this Moosehead, it’s just that this style of beer is dead to me. I am waiting to taste a pale lager which I like... a pale lager which rates higher than 3.0 on the website. Until I have tried a better pale lager, I will never knowingly pay money for a beer which is a pale lager. This was beer #46 for me at the WBF in Durham.
Misformore (34), Colorado, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Oct 19, 2005 Decent flavor and refreshing. Doesn’t stand out that much too me. Typical taste for a lager of this quality
JakeFr5150 (23), Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 6/20 |
Oct 19, 2005 12oz Bottle: In a nutshell, very weak. Nothing noteworthy here. Not the slightest bit of complexity. No aroma at all. Little to no carbonation. Pours a very pale gold, and leave absolutely no head. Extremely thin feel, just like water. Only the aftertaste lets you know that you even drank a beer. Essentially only bought this to get the caps for a bar that I’ll probably make in a few years. Other than that, totally useless.
BeerandBlues2 (3203), Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 |
Oct 18, 2005 Bottle. Pours gold with few bubbles and a small white edgy head with lined lacing. Sour malt (grain) and adjunct notes with yeast (sweat) aroma with faint hop notes. Mild sour malt, yeast flavor with a clean malt finish. Light and fizzy palate, refreshing.
Magicdave6 (5490), London, Greater London, England
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 |
Oct 10, 2005 Eh browny points for the name. There is no aroma. Taste actually has soem grapefruity hops, though as it warms they taste artificial, dry finish.
|
Rate This
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)